My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one 
slot, permanently. It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk 
Ultra, but I use less than 2GB for a running backup of 
working files.

So, the question:

Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM 
(3.2GB recognized), is there any reason whatsoever to 
allocate part of that fast flash card to READYBOOST?

I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was 
intended to enable low-RAM computers to use Vista, but 
that does not answer my question. Even a 2% improvement 
would make sense, since the add-on memory is free and 
available.

Thanks!

Fearless Fred

"Frederick"  wrote in message 
news:g9hss9$pkp$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot, permanently. 
> It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 2GB for a 
> running backup of working files.
>
> So, the question:
>
> Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB recognized), 
> is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that fast flash card to 
> READYBOOST?
>
> I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to enable 
> low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question. Even 
> a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free and 
> available.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Fearless Fred


No. IMHO, with 4GB RAM already installed there's no need for ReadyBoost. If 
I remember correctly, the whole idea behind ReadyBoost was to help laptops 
with, say, just 1GB [or less] RAM run Vista.

Saucy

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:11:05 -0700, Frederick 
wrote:

>Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM 
>(3.2GB recognized), is there any reason whatsoever to 
>allocate part of that fast flash card to READYBOOST?
>
>I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was 
>intended to enable low-RAM computers to use Vista, but 
>that does not answer my question. Even a 2% improvement 
>would make sense, since the add-on memory is free and 
>available.

If you're going to ignore what the experts say - that it's for
low-memory systems - and think that you can feel a 2% boost, then why
are you here?

Go for it.  Nothing anyone here can say will keep you from trying.

Frederick wrote:
> My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot, 
> permanently. It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 
> 2GB for a running backup of working files.
> 
> So, the question:
> 
> Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB 
> recognized), is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that 
> fast flash card to READYBOOST?
> 
> I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to enable 
> low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question. 
> Even a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free 
> and available.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Fearless Fred

I've installed ReadyBoost on two Vista computers, both with 2GB RAM, and 
all I can see is something between zero and nothing in performance gain. 
  I would use your card for the important function you use it for now.

Q

I'm pretty happy with the current situation, but like 
most here I'm always looking for improvement...

Adding complexity always adds risk, so if there's no 
benefit I won't even experiment with it.

Thanks!
Fred

In my opinion if you have 4GB RAM installed the you 'don't' need ready 
boost. As I've said before to other posters I haven't seen any noticeable 
increase in performance on any machine with 2GB or more of RAM. Yes, you 
will see a performance increase if you have less than "GB RAM, but certainly 
not with more than 4GB

-- 

-- 
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web: http://www.silversurferguide.org

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..


"Frederick"  wrote in message 
news:g9hss9$pkp$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot, permanently. 
> It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 2GB for a 
> running backup of working files.
>
> So, the question:
>
> Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB recognized), 
> is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that fast flash card to 
> READYBOOST?
>
> I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to enable 
> low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question. Even 
> a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free and 
> available.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Fearless Fred

John Barnett MVP;826381 Wrote: 
> In my opinion if you have 4GB RAM installed the you 'don't' need ready
> boost. As I've said before to other posters I haven't seen any
> noticeable
> increase in performance on any machine with 2GB or more of RAM. Yes,
> you
> will see a performance increase if you have less than "GB RAM, but
> certainly
> not with more than 4GB
> 
> --
> 
> --
> John Barnett MVP
> Associate Expert
> Windows Desktop Experience
> 
> Web: 'John Barnett's Windows XP Help and Support'
> (http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org)
> Web: 'John Barnett's Windows Vista Support'
> (http://vistasupport.mvps.org)
> Web: 'Silver Surfer Advisor: Home Page'
> (http://www.silversurferguide.org)
> 
> The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of
> any
> kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
> reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be
> liable for
> any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out
> of the
> use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
> mail/post..
> 
> 
> "Frederick" <freddymac@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:g9hss9$pkp$1@xxxxxx> > > 
> > > My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot,
> > permanently.
> > > It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 2GB for a
> > > running backup of working files.
> > >
> > > So, the question:
> > >
> > > Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB
> > recognized),
> > > is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that fast flash
> > card to
> > > READYBOOST?
> > >
> > > I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to
> > enable
> > > low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question.
> > Even
> > > a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free
> > and
> > > available.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Fearless Fred > > 

agree. if your computer is slow and have 2+gb of ram then it's more
likly thats it is ethier:

A. Hard drive going bad. (I have had this happen to me were before my
hard drive when out my computer was getting slower untill it it finnaly
went out. got it replace and my computer was back up to speed.)

B. You have a slow prossesor. (or you have a celoron prosseser and
thoughs prosseser suck a performance.)


-- 
warmon6

You need USB2.0 controller and flash... but it still has no positive effect 
on a 4GB RAM machine.
Michael

"Frederick"  wrote in message 
news:g9hss9$pkp$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot, permanently. 
> It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 2GB for a 
> running backup of working files.
>
> So, the question:
>
> Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB recognized), 
> is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that fast flash card to 
> READYBOOST?
>
> I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to enable 
> low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question. Even 
> a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free and 
> available.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Fearless Fred

Most ReadyBoost information ismisleading and not accurate. It is not an 
adjunct to RAM - it "assists" Superfectch and works with ReadyBoot. Another 
Ready device is ReadyDrive - a flash cache installed on a HD.

A ReadyBoost device is tested by Vista as to whether or not it's Read/Write 
specs meet or exceed those of the HD - ReadyBoost is usually not of any 
benefit on desktops with high spec HDs., however it is usually of benefit in 
laptops because of laptop HD speeds and lower Read/Write specs.

ReadyBoost performance depends primarily on the type of HD activity - 
non-sequential Read/writes are directed to the ReadyBoost device and 
sequential to the HD.

In addition, over a period of time, ReadyBoost works in concert with Vista 
in "tracking" startup and application usage to provide improved prformance 
(In some circumstances however, ReadyBoost may increase boot time)..


"Phillips"  wrote in message 
news:Ox8JaYRDJHA.4428@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> You need USB2.0 controller and flash... but it still has no positive 
> effect on a 4GB RAM machine.
> Michael
>
> "Frederick"  wrote in message 
> news:g9hss9$pkp$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>> My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot, permanently. 
>> It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 2GB for a 
>> running backup of working files.
>>
>> So, the question:
>>
>> Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB recognized), 
>> is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that fast flash card 
>> to READYBOOST?
>>
>> I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to enable 
>> low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question. 
>> Even a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free 
>> and available.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Fearless Fred
>

Yeah, nice... only that I tried 2 different flash drives both on PC and 
laptop and RBoost failed miserably - slow, sleep/wakeup issues w/ USB. maybe 
a real top speed flash-drive would do the trick.
Michael


"AJR"  wrote in message 
news:OZGY9VTDJHA.4732@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Most ReadyBoost information ismisleading and not accurate. It is not an 
> adjunct to RAM - it "assists" Superfectch and works with ReadyBoot. 
> Another Ready device is ReadyDrive - a flash cache installed on a HD.
>
> A ReadyBoost device is tested by Vista as to whether or not it's 
> Read/Write specs meet or exceed those of the HD - ReadyBoost is usually 
> not of any benefit on desktops with high spec HDs., however it is usually 
> of benefit in laptops because of laptop HD speeds and lower Read/Write 
> specs.
>
> ReadyBoost performance depends primarily on the type of HD activity - 
> non-sequential Read/writes are directed to the ReadyBoost device and 
> sequential to the HD.
>
> In addition, over a period of time, ReadyBoost works in concert with Vista 
> in "tracking" startup and application usage to provide improved prformance 
> (In some circumstances however, ReadyBoost may increase boot time)..
>
>
> "Phillips"  wrote in message 
> news:Ox8JaYRDJHA.4428@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> You need USB2.0 controller and flash... but it still has no positive 
>> effect on a 4GB RAM machine.
>> Michael
>>
>> "Frederick"  wrote in message 
>> news:g9hss9$pkp$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>> My laptop has a flush-mounted flash memory card in one slot, 
>>> permanently. It is an 8GB super fast SanDisk Ultra, but I use less than 
>>> 2GB for a running backup of working files.
>>>
>>> So, the question:
>>>
>>> Given a T7700 2.4GHz laptop with 4GB of installed RAM (3.2GB 
>>> recognized), is there any reason whatsoever to allocate part of that 
>>> fast flash card to READYBOOST?
>>>
>>> I've seen information suggesting that Readyboost was intended to enable 
>>> low-RAM computers to use Vista, but that does not answer my question. 
>>> Even a 2% improvement would make sense, since the add-on memory is free 
>>> and available.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Fearless Fred
>>
>
>