Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
platform
active.directory
adsi
adsi.iis-admin
base
com_ole
complus_mts
component_svcs
database
directx
gdi
graphics_mm
internet.client
internet.server
internet.server.isapi-dev
localization
mapi
messaging
msi
mslayerforunicode
multimedia
networking
networking.ipv6
sdk_install
security
shell
telephony.tapi_2
telephony.tapi_3
telephony.tsp
telephony.wte
tools
ui
ui_shell
win_base_svcs
win16
  
 
date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:38:36 -0800,    group: microsoft.public.platformsdk.com_ole        back       


Re: asynchronous....   
>
>What is the advantage of MTA over STA, to a COM object that is an
>accessor to a shared non-COM singleton? I guess I am missing
>something...

The main advantage is performance. If properly coded, MTA objects will 
usually outperform STA objects. However, if the methods and properties do 
nothing other than access your non-COM singleton object that is protected by 
a synchronization object, probably MTA objects only match the performance.

Brian
date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:38:36 -0800   author:   Brian Muth

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us