Hi there! As far as I can see from the v3 spec, there are only two possible scenarios: 1. intra-node ownership transfer 2. inter-node custody transfer Could anybody explain why it couldn't be an inter-node ownership transfer? Does it mean there must be only one owner for a node? Thanks, Andrew
Oooh... intra-node CUSTODY transfer seems to be not applicable because the term "custody" is a node-specific one. inter-node OWNERSHIP transfer seems to be a degenerate case because ownership always changes if custody changes That's it for now, Andrew