I am using DISPLAYINFO in XMLA for getting Child count of the member. It is working fine but in one dimension and after a certain level it is not returning the actual (correct) value. It is just returning 1000 value of displayinfo for every member after everny level. Can any one help me out what could be the problem ? Is this a XMLA Problem or something wrong with my dimension structure ? Thanks in Advance Faraz
Child count in the DISPLAY_INFO structure is not guaranteed to be an accurate number -- it is an estimate. In many scenarios it is simply too expensive to figure out the precise count of children. Thanks, Akshai -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. "Faraz" wrote in message news:1123138300.791200.236900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > I am using DISPLAYINFO in XMLA for getting Child count of the member. > It is working fine but in one dimension and after a certain level it is > not returning the actual (correct) value. It is just returning 1000 > value of displayinfo for every member after everny level. Can any one > help me out what could be the problem ? Is this a XMLA Problem or > something wrong with my dimension structure ? > > Thanks in Advance > > Faraz >
But it is giving me correct Child in all other case. Just one Dimesion is causing problem at its 5th level. Is there anyway i can resolve this problem.
As I said, it is an estimate. In some cases (when it is efficient), we may return an accurate number. But you should not expect it to be accurate every time. Thanks, Akshai -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. "Faraz" wrote in message news:1123568343.081151.167510@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > But it is giving me correct Child in all other case. Just one Dimesion > is causing problem at its 5th level. Is there anyway i can resolve this > problem. >