Is MSF designed for software development or for infrastructure planning and design or a combination of both?
MSF 3.0 is "build IT right" where IT includes software projects and infrastructure planning. Take a look at "Windows Server System Reference Architecture" http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/wssra/raguide/default.mspx is a good example of MSF and MOF for infrastructure. Cristian Lefter, SQL Server MVP "unclear" wrote in message news:155101c555e0$6dc290b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... > Is MSF designed for software development or for > infrastructure planning and design or a combination of > both?
MSF 4 is most certainly meant for software development - especially the Agile content. BR Bob Palank "Cristian Lefter" wrote in message news:OgXK0ggVFHA.2444@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > MSF 3.0 is "build IT right" where IT includes software projects and > infrastructure planning. > Take a look at "Windows Server System Reference Architecture" > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/wssra/raguide/default.mspx is > a good example of MSF and MOF for infrastructure. > > Cristian Lefter, SQL Server MVP > > > "unclear" wrote in message > news:155101c555e0$6dc290b0$a501280a@phx.gbl... >> Is MSF designed for software development or for >> infrastructure planning and design or a combination of >> both? > >
I am looking for examples of the questions get asked in exam, this is first exam I have failed and need some practise questions.... Thanks
Hello Callie, Unfortunately I am unaware of any practise exams for this exam as yet - too few people sitting the exam as yet to make the development of such an exam profitable Ian Thwaites BIT,MCT,MCSD,MSF Practitioner > I am looking for examples of the questions get asked in exam, this is > first > exam I have failed and need some practise questions.... > Thanks
In message <2UPie.4290$eR.3747@fe05.lga>, Bob Palank writes >MSF 4 is most certainly meant for software development - especially the >Agile content. If you look at it, both MSF Agile and MSF CMMI are both agile processes! -- Thomas Lee (tfl@psp.co.uk)
Thomas Lee wrote: > In message <2UPie.4290$eR.3747@fe05.lga>, Bob Palank > writes >> MSF 4 is most certainly meant for software development - especially >> the Agile content. > > If you look at it, both MSF Agile and MSF CMMI are both agile > processes! The process model of MSF CMMI is not "strictly" agile... But the rest is very similar... -- Lorenzo Barbieri MCT, MCSD.NET, MCDBA IT: http://www.geniodelmale.info EN: http://www.lorenzobarbieri.info UGIdotNET - http://www.ugidotnet.org
In message , Lorenzo Barbieri writes >Thomas Lee wrote: >> In message <2UPie.4290$eR.3747@fe05.lga>, Bob Palank >> writes >>> MSF 4 is most certainly meant for software development - especially >>> the Agile content. >> >> If you look at it, both MSF Agile and MSF CMMI are both agile >> processes! > >The process model of MSF CMMI is not "strictly" agile... But the rest is >very similar... True. Nevertheless - MS are pushing MSF-CMMI as an agile process. Personally, I see it as a move away from a framework and more towards a methodology. -- Thomas Lee (tfl@psp.co.uk)
Thomas Lee wrote: >> The process model of MSF CMMI is not "strictly" agile... But the >> rest is very similar... > > True. Nevertheless - MS are pushing MSF-CMMI as an agile process. > Personally, I see it as a move away from a framework and more towards > a methodology. Agree. MSF 4 is much more a methodology than a framework. I've already taught a selfmade course about MSF 4 (both versions) and my approach to the course was very different from the classic MSF MOC, because of the changes in MSF. The "framework" part of MSF is still present, because I think that you cannot use it "as is" but you need to customize it and customize the tool, but the kind of guidance already in it and the tool support was indeed very useful. I hope that there will be a increased demand about MSF, because it can really help developing better software. -- Lorenzo Barbieri MCT, MCSD.NET, MCDBA IT: http://www.geniodelmale.info EN: http://www.lorenzobarbieri.info UGIdotNET - http://www.ugidotnet.org
