|
|
|
date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:58:31 -0600,
group: microsoft.public.vstudio.general
back
Re: VS 2008 source code control questions
1) The Options menu button on the Check In dialog toolbar contains a 'Keep
all checked out' item. Beware, it's a toggle, it will stay on the next time
you check in. Why not a checkbox as in VSS? Dunno...
2) I hate it as well. Do you use the treeview in the check in dialog? Just
clear the solution checkbox (root of the tree and it clears the whole list).
3) I don't know but if keeping files checked out all the time is the way you
work, it might be worth using a SCC that supports the Edit-Merge-Commit
scheme (Vault, SVN,...) instead of VSS' Checkout-Edit-Checkin scheme.
4) You do that in the SCC client, don't you?
HTH
Serge.
http://www.apptranslator.com - Localization tool for your C++ applications
"David Thielen" <thielen@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:r7vd54dqugr9pajv3uofvancl2d2jm2val@4ax.com...
> Hi;
>
> I don't know if this is the right place to ask this. If not, please
> tell me what NG.
>
> 1) How do I do a check in, keep checked out (like VSS has)? We
> desperately need this.
>
> 2) When doing a check in it shows all files with the ones to check in
> checked. As we have about 7,000 files in our project, this is useless.
> Is there a way to have it show just the files bing checked in?
>
> 3) When I ask it for all files that are changed, is there a way in
> that window to check in (keep checked out) those files - by selecting
> the ones I want checked in?
>
> 4) How do I mark files as keep latest version only? We have a bunch of
> DLLs we build in other projects and we don't want to store all
> versions of them. Same for bitmaps - the bitmaps are small but there
> is no need to store their history.
>
> thanks - dave
>
> david@at-at-at@windward.dot.dot.net
> Windward Reports -- http://www.WindwardReports.com
> me -- http://dave.thielen.com
>
> Cubicle Wars - http://www.windwardreports.com/film.htm
date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:30:43 +0200
author: Serge Wautier
Re: VS 2008 source code control questions
Hi;
1) I don't see an Options button in the check in dialog. Where is it?
2) Tree is almost as worthless as each dir is a root node - so we've
still got hundreds of root nodes.
3) I'm starting to think the same thing - the VS 2008 system is
striking me as the old Microsoft 0.9 version approach - not complete
enough to be usable.
4) I don't see any way in the client to set this.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:30:43 +0200, "Serge Wautier"
wrote:
>1) The Options menu button on the Check In dialog toolbar contains a 'Keep
>all checked out' item. Beware, it's a toggle, it will stay on the next time
>you check in. Why not a checkbox as in VSS? Dunno...
>
>2) I hate it as well. Do you use the treeview in the check in dialog? Just
>clear the solution checkbox (root of the tree and it clears the whole list).
>
>3) I don't know but if keeping files checked out all the time is the way you
>work, it might be worth using a SCC that supports the Edit-Merge-Commit
>scheme (Vault, SVN,...) instead of VSS' Checkout-Edit-Checkin scheme.
>
>4) You do that in the SCC client, don't you?
>
>HTH
>
>Serge.
>http://www.apptranslator.com - Localization tool for your C++ applications
>
>
>"David Thielen" <thielen@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
>news:r7vd54dqugr9pajv3uofvancl2d2jm2val@4ax.com...
>> Hi;
>>
>> I don't know if this is the right place to ask this. If not, please
>> tell me what NG.
>>
>> 1) How do I do a check in, keep checked out (like VSS has)? We
>> desperately need this.
>>
>> 2) When doing a check in it shows all files with the ones to check in
>> checked. As we have about 7,000 files in our project, this is useless.
>> Is there a way to have it show just the files bing checked in?
>>
>> 3) When I ask it for all files that are changed, is there a way in
>> that window to check in (keep checked out) those files - by selecting
>> the ones I want checked in?
>>
>> 4) How do I mark files as keep latest version only? We have a bunch of
>> DLLs we build in other projects and we don't want to store all
>> versions of them. Same for bitmaps - the bitmaps are small but there
>> is no need to store their history.
>>
>> thanks - dave
>>
>> david@at-at-at@windward.dot.dot.net
>> Windward Reports -- http://www.WindwardReports.com
>> me -- http://dave.thielen.com
>>
>> Cubicle Wars - http://www.windwardreports.com/film.htm
david@at-at-at@windward.dot.dot.net
Windward Reports -- http://www.WindwardReports.com
me -- http://dave.thielen.com
Cubicle Wars - http://www.windwardreports.com/film.htm
date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:14:24 -0600
author: David Thielen am
|
|
