Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
tools
vsnet.act
vsnet.debugging
vsnet.documentation
vsnet.enterprise.tools
vsnet.general
vsnet.ide
vsnet.jlca
vsnet.servicepacks
vsnet.setup
vsnet.vsip
vsnet.vss
vsnet.vstools.office
vstudio.development
vstudio.extensibility
vstudio.general
vstudio.helpauthoring
vstudio.setup
vstudio.sourcesafe
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:13:55 -0500,    group: microsoft.public.vsnet.general        back       


Status of Rich Text Editor Replacements   
About a year ago, when we had intentions of using MOSS for CMS purposes, I 
added Telerik's RadEditor web part to our farm.

Two reasons for doing that:

 - we needed the advanced options it gave for text formatting
 - we wanted to support non IE browsers as much as we could

The catch was that it added another web part, so we had both the Rich Text 
web part and the Telerik Web Part, meaning someone could still add both to a 
page and someone without IE could still have trouble using it.

We finally gave up on the CMS features in MOSS and never did much with it.

A year later, we're about to roll out our collaboration portal and I'm 
debating if we should install it. I was wondering what the current thoughts 
on Text Editor replaces are for MOSS. Is Telerik still the only game in 
town? Anyone get TinyMCE working in MOSS? Has anyone ran into issues using 
Telerik's option over the long-term on a farm?

-Darrel
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:13:55 -0500   author:   darrel

Re: Status of Rich Text Editor Replacements   
ack. Apologies. Wrong newsgroup!

-Darrel


> About a year ago, when we had intentions of using MOSS for CMS purposes, I 
> added Telerik's RadEditor web part to our farm.
>
> Two reasons for doing that:
>
> - we needed the advanced options it gave for text formatting
> - we wanted to support non IE browsers as much as we could
>
> The catch was that it added another web part, so we had both the Rich Text 
> web part and the Telerik Web Part, meaning someone could still add both to 
> a page and someone without IE could still have trouble using it.
>
> We finally gave up on the CMS features in MOSS and never did much with it.
>
> A year later, we're about to roll out our collaboration portal and I'm 
> debating if we should install it. I was wondering what the current 
> thoughts on Text Editor replaces are for MOSS. Is Telerik still the only 
> game in town? Anyone get TinyMCE working in MOSS? Has anyone ran into 
> issues using Telerik's option over the long-term on a farm?
>
> -Darrel
>
date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:34:04 -0500   author:   darrel

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us