Hello, By reading the documentation, it seems that it is only possible to define arrays for inline types, and not for scalar types. Of course, it should be possible to wrap scalar types into a new inline type, but this may be some overread for "just" building an array of strings property. Is this a limitation of arrays ? or is it planned to extend arrays to scalar types in the future ? (I guess the same comment can be made for sets) Regards
Sylvain - we're taking a long hard look at how arrays are used with the data model. Adding support for arrays of scalars is one of the areas that we're looking at. BTW what are you using arrays of inline types for? (We're looking at improving the modelling capabilities of Fragments and in the course of doing this we end up overlapping to some extent with arrays.) Thanks Dave. Dave Nettleton[MSFT] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights. "Sylvain" wrote in message news:93F01A7E-4AFB-4DDA-A300-BB8A8306A8C4@microsoft.com... > Hello, > > By reading the documentation, it seems that it is only possible to define > arrays for inline types, and not for scalar types. Of course, it should be > possible to wrap scalar types into a new inline type, but this may be some > overread for "just" building an array of strings property. > > Is this a limitation of arrays ? or is it planned to extend arrays to scalar > types in the future ? > > (I guess the same comment can be made for sets) > > Regards
