Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Windos
win32.3rdparty
win32.directx.audio
win32.directx.ddk
win32.directx.graphics
win32.directx.input
win32.directx.managed
win32.directx.misc
win32.directx.networking
win32.directx.sdk
win32.directx.video
win32.dirx.grap.shaders
win32.gdi
win32.international
win32.kernel
win32.messaging
win32.mmedia
win32.networks
win32.ole
win32.rtc
win32.tapi
win32.tapi.beta
win32.tools
win32.ui
win32.wince
win32.wmi
windows.mediacenter
winfx.aero
winfx.announcements
winfx.avalon
winfx.collaboration
winfx.fundamentals
winfx.general
winfx.indigo
winfx.sdk
winfx.winfs
  
 
date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:28:35 +0300,    group: microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ui        back       


Portable C++ GUI framework   
I am looking for a decent portable C++ (meaning C++ API, not C) GUI
framework that works both on Linux and Windows, so as to study and learn
it. That is, there should be at least one good decent book about it.


One option is QT. QT licensing however, is to pay for the QT framework,
for running non GPL applications on Windows.

Does anyone know any decent (like QT) portable C++ GUI framework for
Linux and Windows with good documentation (books) available?
date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:28:35 +0300   author:   Ioannis Vranos

Re: Portable C++ GUI framework   
"Ioannis Vranos" wrote:
> Does anyone know any decent (like QT) portable C++ GUI framework 
> for Linux and Windows with good documentation (books) available?

The wxWidgets is worth mentioning.

http://www.wxwidgets.org/

HTH
Alex
date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:51:02 +0300   author:   Alex Blekhman

Re: Portable C++ GUI framework   
I have a wxWidgets based application and it works pretty well.  

I've found a lot of bugs in wxWidgets over the years.  I've fixed a lot of 
them and submitted (high quality) patches back that got bounced because they 
weren't done the way the committer wanted.  (Like I have time to re-write 
patches).  I've basically given up and I'm just diverging further and further 
from the mainline.

If I had it to do all over again, I would pay for QT.  If they will fix bugs 
for me it's worth the money.

Actually, if I had it to do all over again, I would write it as a web app!  
Seriously, check out gwt.  Client applications are soooo 1995.

http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/


"Alex Blekhman" wrote:

> "Ioannis Vranos" wrote:
> > Does anyone know any decent (like QT) portable C++ GUI framework 
> > for Linux and Windows with good documentation (books) available?
> 
> The wxWidgets is worth mentioning.
> 
> http://www.wxwidgets.org/
> 
> HTH
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
>
date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 13:07:01 -0700   author:   Vince Harron

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us