|
|
|
date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:03:32 +0200,
group: microsoft.public.win32.programmer.messaging
back
Re: Is ECE still the technology to use
On 28 jun, 23:12, "SvenC" <Sv...@nospam.nospam> wrote:
> Hi Mads,
>
> > Do you know of any good webpages about how to use COM add-ins instead
> > of ECE. For example to create a custom message class.
> > I have tried to google the subject but no luck so far.
>
> Neither ECE nor COM addins can implement custom message classes.
> You need to use either Outlook forms or implement a MAPI form server.
> Here is a starter:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms527920(EXCHG.10).aspx
>
> --
> SvenC
Hi,
True for the forms, nevertheless, for any other functionalities
related to Outlook, I strongly recommend Redemption, written by Dmitry
Streblechenko, whose webpage you'll find in his message.
He's probably one of the best Outlook/exchange gurus around these days.
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
author: patochem
Re: Is ECE still the technology to use
Hi patochem,
> On 28 jun, 23:12, "SvenC" <Sv...@nospam.nospam> wrote:
>> Hi Mads,
>>
>>> Do you know of any good webpages about how to use COM add-ins
>>> instead of ECE. For example to create a custom message class.
>>> I have tried to google the subject but no luck so far.
>>
>> Neither ECE nor COM addins can implement custom message classes.
>> You need to use either Outlook forms or implement a MAPI form server.
>> Here is a
>> starter:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms527920(EXCHG.10).aspx
>
> True for the forms, nevertheless, for any other functionalities
> related to Outlook, I strongly recommend Redemption, written by Dmitry
> Streblechenko, whose webpage you'll find in his message.
That will only help when developing Outlook forms not for developing
MAPI forms. And the OP seems to be confused what a COM Addin or ECE
can do for him.
> He's probably one of the best Outlook/exchange gurus around these
> days.
Absolutely!
--
SvenC
date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:00:31 +0200
author: SvenC am
|
|