Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
DotNet
acad.assignment.mngr
academic
adonet
aspnet
aspnet.announcements
aspnet.build.controls
aspnet.caching
aspnet.datagridcontrol
aspnet.mobile
aspnet.security
aspnet.webcontrols
aspnet.webservices
clr
compactframework
component_services
datatools
distributed_apps
drawing
faqs
framework
framework.wmi
general
internationalization
interop
languages.csharp
languages.jscript
languages.vb
languages.vb.controls
languages.vb.data
languages.vb.upgrade
languages.vc
languages.vc.libraries
myservices
odbcnet
performance
remoting
scripting
sdk
security
setup
vjsharp
vsa
webservi.enhancements
webservices
windowsforms
windowsforms.controls
winforms.databinding
winforms.designtime
xml
  
 
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:48:09 -0700 (PDT),    group: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework        back       


StackPanel for .Net 2.0   
Hi,

is there something like a StackPanel from WPF for the normal Windows
Forms Library?
I have to update a .Net 2.0 Application with a better User Interface,
but .Net3.5 is not possible,
because the application has to run on Windows 2000.

Thanks, for your help,

Andre
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:48:09 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Rotlaus

Re: StackPanel for .Net 2.0   
On Aug 13, 3:48 pm, Rotlaus  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there something like a StackPanel from WPF for the normal Windows
> Forms Library?
> I have to update a .Net 2.0 Application with a better User Interface,
> but .Net3.5 is not possible,
> because the application has to run on Windows 2000.

FlowLayoutPanel is probably the closest (just don't forget to set
AutoSize to true, and AutoSizeMode to GrowAndShrink), though single-
column/row TableLayoutPanel can also be used. All in all, though,
WinForms layouts are a pain to work with (particularly from within the
visual editor).
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:03:05 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Pavel Minaev

Re: StackPanel for .Net 2.0   
On 13 Aug., 14:03, Pavel Minaev  wrote:
> On Aug 13, 3:48 pm, Rotlaus  wrote:
> > is there something like a StackPanel from WPF for the normal Windows
> > Forms Library?
> > I have to update a .Net 2.0 Application with a better User Interface,
> > but .Net3.5 is not possible,
> > because the application has to run on Windows 2000.
>
> FlowLayoutPanel is probably the closest (just don't forget to set
> AutoSize to true, and AutoSizeMode to GrowAndShrink), though single-
> column/row TableLayoutPanel can also be used. All in all, though,
> WinForms layouts are a pain to work with (particularly from within the
> visual editor).

I would love to use Xaml and WPF, but as there is this requirement
for
Win2000 i have no choice.
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:15:25 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Rotlaus

Re: StackPanel for .Net 2.0   
>>I would love to use Xaml and WPF, but as there is this requirement
>>for
>>Win2000 i have no choice.

Are you sure 3.5 isn't supported on Windows 2000?  I haven't seen the system 
requirements for it, but I'm relatively certain that Silverlight 2.0 is 
going to be Win2K compatible, so I'd be surprised if 3.5 isn't.
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:24:37 -0500   author:   Alex Clark ail

Re: StackPanel for .Net 2.0   
Hi,

.NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5 are definitely not supported on W2k.

Kind regards,
Henning Krause

"Alex Clark" <quanta@noemail.noemail> wrote in message 
news:ujNdgKY$IHA.792@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>I would love to use Xaml and WPF, but as there is this requirement
>>>for
>>>Win2000 i have no choice.
>
> Are you sure 3.5 isn't supported on Windows 2000?  I haven't seen the 
> system requirements for it, but I'm relatively certain that Silverlight 
> 2.0 is going to be Win2K compatible, so I'd be surprised if 3.5 isn't.
>
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:43:15 +0200   author:   Henning Krause [MVP - Exchange]

Re: StackPanel for .Net 2.0   
On Aug 14, 12:24 am, "Alex Clark" <qua...@noemail.noemail> wrote:
> >>I would love to use Xaml and WPF, but as there is this requirement
> >>for
> >>Win2000 i have no choice.
>
> Are you sure 3.5 isn't supported on Windows 2000?  I haven't seen the system
> requirements for it, but I'm relatively certain that Silverlight 2.0 is
> going to be Win2K compatible, so I'd be surprised if 3.5 isn't.

Silverlight is not .NET 3.5, it has its own version of the runtime.
3.5 requires XP as a minimum. One can install 2.0 SP1 or SP2 (which
are parts of 3.5 and 3.5 SP1, respectively) on Win2K, but they don't
include any of the 3.x bits.
date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:34:36 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Pavel Minaev

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us