Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
DotNet
acad.assignment.mngr
academic
adonet
aspnet
aspnet.announcements
aspnet.build.controls
aspnet.caching
aspnet.datagridcontrol
aspnet.mobile
aspnet.security
aspnet.webcontrols
aspnet.webservices
clr
compactframework
component_services
datatools
distributed_apps
drawing
faqs
framework
framework.wmi
general
internationalization
interop
languages.csharp
languages.jscript
languages.vb
languages.vb.controls
languages.vb.data
languages.vb.upgrade
languages.vc
languages.vc.libraries
myservices
odbcnet
performance
remoting
scripting
sdk
security
setup
vjsharp
vsa
webservi.enhancements
webservices
windowsforms
windowsforms.controls
winforms.databinding
winforms.designtime
xml
  
 
date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:54:56 -0800 (PST),    group: microsoft.public.dotnet.distributed_apps        back       


help- .NET application - very tough architecture question   
A friend has the WORST software architecture situation in the world.
I was wondering if anyone could help me walk him through it.

He has a business logic engine for mapping 3-d data to the screen
written in C++.

His clients want him to create a thin-client, preferably a web-based
tool on a CD-Rom.  This can have an access database on the backend.
The clients want to deliver this product in 2009.  So there will be a
cd rom with a one-click install that will utilize the 3d mapping
engine in C++.

He must then take the same code and implement it on a server in 2010.
The same front-end and the same middleware must be put on a server.
The clients do not have a server now.

As you can imagine this is a noncommercial product.  The above
requirements cannot change unless we can positively prove they won't
work.

We are looking into how to architect something like this.  Any tips or
tricks?

thanks!
date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:54:56 -0800 (PST)   author:   unknown

Re: help- .NET application - very tough architecture question   
anyone?


On Mar 7, 10:54 pm, bbcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> A friend has the WORST software architecture situation in the world.
> I was wondering if anyone could help me walk him through it.
>
> He has a business logic engine for mapping 3-d data to the screen
> written in C++.
>
> His clients want him to create a thin-client, preferably a web-based
> tool on a CD-Rom.  This can have an access database on the backend.
> The clients want to deliver this product in 2009.  So there will be a
> cd rom with a one-click install that will utilize the 3d mapping
> engine in C++.
>
> He must then take the same code and implement it on a server in 2010.
> The same front-end and the same middleware must be put on a server.
> The clients do not have a server now.
>
> As you can imagine this is a noncommercial product.  The above
> requirements cannot change unless we can positively prove they won't
> work.
>
> We are looking into how to architect something like this.  Any tips or
> tricks?
>
> thanks!
date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:56:03 -0700 (PDT)   author:   unknown

Re: help- .NET application - very tough architecture question   
.Net installer for CD.

Thin client.. unsure... will depend on clients having web access... need 
more deets on that.

Server - .Net 3.5, WPF actually provides a load of 3d tools - I just 
finished a 3D engine in WPF... 1 click installer, on a CD.

Sound good?

SegFault.


 wrote in message 
news:6dada589-4bca-418a-8d94-bf8faebbd9d4@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> anyone?
>
>
> On Mar 7, 10:54 pm, bbcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> A friend has the WORST software architecture situation in the world.
>> I was wondering if anyone could help me walk him through it.
>>
>> He has a business logic engine for mapping 3-d data to the screen
>> written in C++.
>>
>> His clients want him to create a thin-client, preferably a web-based
>> tool on a CD-Rom.  This can have an access database on the backend.
>> The clients want to deliver this product in 2009.  So there will be a
>> cd rom with a one-click install that will utilize the 3d mapping
>> engine in C++.
>>
>> He must then take the same code and implement it on a server in 2010.
>> The same front-end and the same middleware must be put on a server.
>> The clients do not have a server now.
>>
>> As you can imagine this is a noncommercial product.  The above
>> requirements cannot change unless we can positively prove they won't
>> work.
>>
>> We are looking into how to architect something like this.  Any tips or
>> tricks?
>>
>> thanks!
>
date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:07:19 -0000   author:   simon-john roberts

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us