Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
2000
active_directory
advanced_server
applications
cmdprompt.admin
developer
dns
enable
fax
file_system
games
general
group_policy
hardware
msi
multimedia
netware
networking
new_user
printing
ras_routing
registry
security
setup
setup_deployment
setup_upgrade
termserv.apps
termserv.clients
windows_update
  
 
date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:38:22 -0500,    group: microsoft.public.win2000.windows_update        back       


.net versions   
does .net version 2 replace ver 1?  i would have thought it does but 
sometimes am promplted to install ver 1.1 or other even though 2.0 is 
already there?
date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:38:22 -0500   author:   Tim

Re: .net versions   
Sort of.. but not really. They're designed to sit side-by-side, just like 
v1.0 and v1.1; however, some v1.1 code will run on the v2.0 framework. 
(There's no guarantee, however.)

A lot of v1.1 based code will -not- run on the v2.0 framework and will 
expect to see the v1.1 framework. There is an admin setting where you can 
tell the v1.1 apps to use the v2.0 framework, but I don't recommend doing 
that unless you're extremely familiar with the .NET Framework -and- you have 
sufficient resources to thoroughly test the execution of your v1.1 
application in the v2.0 framework environment.

"Tim"  wrote in message 
news:eB5JUkfHGHA.516@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
> does .net version 2 replace ver 1?  i would have thought it does but 
> sometimes am promplted to install ver 1.1 or other even though 2.0 is 
> already there?
>
>
>
date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:44:46 -0600   author:   Lawrence Garvin \(MVP\) alias

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us