Hi there, I know there where some threads last year dealing with this, but I can't find them anymore. I'm running a little fax programm that uses MS fax service on a win2000 prof machine. The programm is written in C# using FAXCOMLib library to access fax services. Everything works fine as long as there is only one job in the faxqueue. As soon as there are say 10 jobs ore more, sometimes (randomly) a fax is send to a wrong recipient. As far as I can see this happens when an outbound call is interrupted somehow. It looks like the following fax(es) in the queue are/is transmitted to the address that was preveously interrupted. Does anyone know the reason for this behavior (and a solution) ? Thanks a lot in advance
That's hardly possible. Do you have fax logs to substantiate this? "constructor" wrote in message news:u%23W5uZP7FHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > Hi there, > > I know there where some threads last year dealing with this, but I can't > find them anymore. > > I'm running a little fax programm that uses MS fax service on a win2000 > prof > machine. The programm is written in C# using FAXCOMLib library to access > fax > services. Everything works fine as long as there is only one job in the > faxqueue. As soon as there are say 10 jobs ore more, sometimes (randomly) > a > fax is send to a wrong recipient. As far as I can see this happens when an > outbound call is interrupted somehow. It looks like the following fax(es) > in > the queue are/is transmitted to the address that was preveously > interrupted. > > Does anyone know the reason for this behavior (and a solution) ? > > Thanks a lot in advance > >
nice attitude. "Alex Feinman [MVP]" wrote in message news:%23XyQjsV7FHA.3864@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > That's hardly possible. Do you have fax logs to substantiate this? > > "constructor" wrote in message > news:u%23W5uZP7FHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >> Hi there, >> >> I know there where some threads last year dealing with this, but I can't >> find them anymore. >> >> I'm running a little fax programm that uses MS fax service on a win2000 >> prof >> machine. The programm is written in C# using FAXCOMLib library to access >> fax >> services. Everything works fine as long as there is only one job in the >> faxqueue. As soon as there are say 10 jobs ore more, sometimes (randomly) >> a >> fax is send to a wrong recipient. As far as I can see this happens when >> an >> outbound call is interrupted somehow. It looks like the following fax(es) >> in >> the queue are/is transmitted to the address that was preveously >> interrupted. >> >> Does anyone know the reason for this behavior (and a solution) ? >> >> Thanks a lot in advance >> >> >
It has nothing to do with attitude. 90% of problems reported turn out to be user errors of one sort or another. Since a lot of people use the fax engine to send faxes without experiencing this kind of problem and this was the very first report of this kind I know of, it is only normal to be suspicious. "Phantom F. Harlock" wrote in message news:%23en%23EAVEGHA.2300@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > nice attitude. > > "Alex Feinman [MVP]" wrote in message > news:%23XyQjsV7FHA.3864@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >> That's hardly possible. Do you have fax logs to substantiate this? >> >> "constructor" wrote in message >> news:u%23W5uZP7FHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I know there where some threads last year dealing with this, but I can't >>> find them anymore. >>> >>> I'm running a little fax programm that uses MS fax service on a win2000 >>> prof >>> machine. The programm is written in C# using FAXCOMLib library to access >>> fax >>> services. Everything works fine as long as there is only one job in the >>> faxqueue. As soon as there are say 10 jobs ore more, sometimes >>> (randomly) a >>> fax is send to a wrong recipient. As far as I can see this happens when >>> an >>> outbound call is interrupted somehow. It looks like the following >>> fax(es) in >>> the queue are/is transmitted to the address that was preveously >>> interrupted. >>> >>> Does anyone know the reason for this behavior (and a solution) ? >>> >>> Thanks a lot in advance >>> >>> >> > >
