|
|
|
date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:41:00 -0700,
group: microsoft.public.cmserver.general
back
Re: DIV(CSS) Vs Tables in MCMS Template
On Jul 16, 11:41 pm, ankit.sri wrote:
> Hi,
> I have designed a MCMS Website, and it follows the concept of Master/Content
> Page where content pages are nothing but MCMS Templates,the site was looked
> by one of our Quality Analysis guy and he came up with queries on using
> Tables instead of DIV with CSS and with a logic that a Page with DIV is
> faster than a page with Table.I have no clue about that logic but is the
> logic of having a DIV is good or a table, the reason why we used Table is to
> have a structred layout with AMC(Auhtoring Mode Container) and
> PMC(Presentation Mode Container) in one MCMS Template, can any one help me
> with how logical or illogical the comments are on DIV/Tables.
> --
> A fundamental rule in technology says whatever can be done will be done
Not really a MCMS question, much more of a CSS/HTML question. But for
accessibility standards, and speed of displaying content, then DIV is
the way to go. For a table, the whole table, all rows and cells have
to be loaded before it can be properly displayed. Where as DIV's and
CSS it is displayed immediately. You should use a table for table/
grid based content, for everything else you should use DIV.
date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
author: George Leithead
|
|
