Wanted to know if we could move to 3.5 (we're on 1.1 with SP2 installed)? Read that the install fails because of J# but after the install, will there be runtime issues? Have there been any tests applied to MCMS2002 SP2 for 3.5 framework? Just wanted to know if it will be supported. I know the support ends soon... Thanks.
Hi Kyong, the answer is no. MCMS only supports .NET 2.0. Cheers, Stefan "kyong" <kyongkwak@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:484ABD0B-04B3-46F6-95B0-C3A335E9D0B7@microsoft.com... > Wanted to know if we could move to 3.5 (we're on 1.1 with SP2 installed)? > > Read that the install fails because of J# but after the install, will > there > be runtime issues? Have there been any tests applied to MCMS2002 SP2 for > 3.5 > framework? > > Just wanted to know if it will be supported. I know the support ends > soon... > > Thanks.
Hmm. thanks for the reply. That's a shame. I read something by you, that suggested that there might be plans for an SP3 for MCMS. Are there any updates to that? "Stefan GoÃner [MSFT]" wrote: > Hi Kyong, > > the answer is no. > MCMS only supports .NET 2.0. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > > "kyong" <kyongkwak@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message > news:484ABD0B-04B3-46F6-95B0-C3A335E9D0B7@microsoft.com... > > Wanted to know if we could move to 3.5 (we're on 1.1 with SP2 installed)? > > > > Read that the install fails because of J# but after the install, will > > there > > be runtime issues? Have there been any tests applied to MCMS2002 SP2 for > > 3.5 > > framework? > > > > Just wanted to know if it will be supported. I know the support ends > > soon... > > > > Thanks. > >
Hi Kyong, these plans have been cancelled. Cheers, Stefan "kyong" <kyongkwak@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:A2279771-05FA-4C8E-9586-66527FBC22CD@microsoft.com... > Hmm. thanks for the reply. That's a shame. > I read something by you, that suggested that there might be plans for an > SP3 > for MCMS. Are there any updates to that? > > "Stefan GoÃner [MSFT]" wrote: > >> Hi Kyong, >> >> the answer is no. >> MCMS only supports .NET 2.0. >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan >> >> >> "kyong" <kyongkwak@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message >> news:484ABD0B-04B3-46F6-95B0-C3A335E9D0B7@microsoft.com... >> > Wanted to know if we could move to 3.5 (we're on 1.1 with SP2 >> > installed)? >> > >> > Read that the install fails because of J# but after the install, will >> > there >> > be runtime issues? Have there been any tests applied to MCMS2002 SP2 >> > for >> > 3.5 >> > framework? >> > >> > Just wanted to know if it will be supported. I know the support ends >> > soon... >> > >> > Thanks. >> >>
Hi Stefan, But isn't .Net 3.5 fundamentally just .Net 2.0 with a couple of extensions? "Stefan GoÃner [MSFT]" wrote: > Hi Kyong, > > the answer is no. > MCMS only supports .NET 2.0. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > > "kyong" <kyongkwak@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message > news:484ABD0B-04B3-46F6-95B0-C3A335E9D0B7@microsoft.com... > > Wanted to know if we could move to 3.5 (we're on 1.1 with SP2 installed)? > > > > Read that the install fails because of J# but after the install, will > > there > > be runtime issues? Have there been any tests applied to MCMS2002 SP2 for > > 3.5 > > framework? > > > > Just wanted to know if it will be supported. I know the support ends > > soon... > > > > Thanks. > >
Hi Kiko, the problem is that there is no J# redistributable available for .NET 3.0. .NET 2.0 was the last version to ship this redistributable. As Site Manager is developed in J# the installer checks for the J# redistributable fitting to the .NET version installed on the box. Cheers, Stefan in general yes. But in .NET 3.0 J# has been "kiko" wrote in message news:A719B482-058B-4924-AFC5-E587BC218E5B@microsoft.com... > Hi Stefan, > > But isn't .Net 3.5 fundamentally just .Net 2.0 with a couple of > extensions? > > "Stefan GoÃner [MSFT]" wrote: > >> Hi Kyong, >> >> the answer is no. >> MCMS only supports .NET 2.0. >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan >> >> >> "kyong" <kyongkwak@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message >> news:484ABD0B-04B3-46F6-95B0-C3A335E9D0B7@microsoft.com... >> > Wanted to know if we could move to 3.5 (we're on 1.1 with SP2 >> > installed)? >> > >> > Read that the install fails because of J# but after the install, will >> > there >> > be runtime issues? Have there been any tests applied to MCMS2002 SP2 >> > for >> > 3.5 >> > framework? >> > >> > Just wanted to know if it will be supported. I know the support ends >> > soon... >> > >> > Thanks. >> >>
