Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Biztalk
acce.forsuppliers
acce.hipaa
acce.hl7
acce.rosettanet
accelerator.finserv
admin
appintegration
framework
general
library
nonxml
orchestration
sdk
server
setup
tools
xlangs
xsharp
  
 
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:08:44 -0400,    group: microsoft.public.biztalk.server        back       


Left over active isoloated adapter instances   
Over time my server seems to accumulate active instances of the isolated 
adapter. My solution includes two web services and one instance of the 
BTSHttpReceive listener, all hosted in the IIS via the isolated adapter. It 
seems like most of the time these instances of the isolated adapter start 
up, do their job, and eventually terminate. But it seems like some instances 
never terminate. We cleaned up a whole bunch of them the other day, some 
with a CreateTime of 3/4/2008, but still purportedly active.

Has anyone else seen this happen? Does anyone have any ideas about the root 
cause?

Thanks,
Zoe
date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:08:44 -0400   author:   Zoe Hart

RE: Left over active isoloated adapter instances   
I have to admit I have never managed to get to the bottom of this completely, 
which annoys me occasionally, but I believe this is pretty standard behaviour 
and should not worry you. (you can terminate them, but I wouldn't bother). 

As far as I understand these are created when a connection from the isolated 
host (on IIS generally) establishes the connection to BizTalk. I believe 
these get reused for futher calls, but mostly - they do not mean somehting is 
actually running on the server and as such should not cause a worry.

-- 
Yossi Dahan
MVP BizTalk Server
http://www.sabratech.co.uk/blogs/yossidahan


"Zoe Hart" wrote:

> Over time my server seems to accumulate active instances of the isolated 
> adapter. My solution includes two web services and one instance of the 
> BTSHttpReceive listener, all hosted in the IIS via the isolated adapter. It 
> seems like most of the time these instances of the isolated adapter start 
> up, do their job, and eventually terminate. But it seems like some instances 
> never terminate. We cleaned up a whole bunch of them the other day, some 
> with a CreateTime of 3/4/2008, but still purportedly active.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this happen? Does anyone have any ideas about the root 
> cause?
> 
> Thanks,
> Zoe 
> 
> 
>
date: Fri, 16 May 2008 01:20:01 -0700   author:   Yossi Dahan [MVP]

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us