|
|
|
date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:39:03 -0800,
group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.win2000
back
RE: Multiple user of one mailbox
Hi Tonny,
yes, you can grant Send/Receve As permissions to additional users as
described in
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/WorkingE2k3Store/e67725bb-8792-4bac-82aa-429fb6ecd8d9.mspx
--
Regards,
Sasa Milovanovic
MCSE:Messaging
sasa.milovanovic(at)exchangemaster.net
www.eugeurope.org
Korisnik "Tonny" napisao je:
> In Exchange 5.5 you could assign more that one user to a mailbox and you
> could assign one of these as the Primary Account for the mailbox.
>
> But in Exchange 2000 and 2003 this feature is not available, because in AD
> the mailbox can only have one user account assigned, since they are part of
> the same object.
>
>
>
> Is there anyway that one can "replicate" the Exchange 5.5 feature mentioned
> above?
>
>
>
> The feature is used in this way:
>
>
>
> You have 20 users in a support centre.
>
>
>
> Many different mailboxes are forwarded to a “Master Mailbox”, which could be
> Support-noreply@domain.com. Customers send their requests or error reports to
> one of the forwarded mailboxes.
>
>
>
> One supervisor user in the support centre has a user account that is the
> owner of the shared mailbox and has permissions to send on behalf of any of
> the forwarded mailboxes.
>
>
>
> Any of the 20 users in the support centre can read the mail in the shared
> mailbox.
>
>
>
> Now the responsibility for the Support-noreply@domain.com mailbox moves to
> another person, let us call him SupportAdmin. How could we let this user
> account take ownership of the Support-noreply@domain.com mailbox, so that no
> permissions had to be changed for the 20 users in the support centre, no
> forwarding rules should be changed and all e-mail messages in the
> Support-noreply@domain.com mailbox would be left unchanged ?
>
>
>
> In Exchange 5.5 we would just change Primary NT account for the
> Support-noreply@domain.com mailbox.
>
>
>
> As far as I can see right now in Exchange 2000 and 2003, I can only get the
> same functionality through the use of public folders. Am I right? Or in other
> words are there any way around this that does not involve public folders ?
>
>
>
> Anyway, thanks a lot for considering my problem(s)
>
>
>
> --
>
> Tonny R Poulsen
>
date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:42:07 -0800
author: Sasa Milovanovic sasa.milovanovic(at)exchangemaster.net
|
|
