Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:54:07 -0500,    group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.setup.installation        back       


ad & exchange replication   
If a company has a DC at the main location running
Windows 2003 Server Standard with DNS, WINS, DHCP, and Exchange 2003 and
wants to put a BDC with Exchange at the remote location. Would anyone
suggest
upgrading their Internet service?

Both locations have cable modems for theirs internet access
Bandwidth test results are listed below.

Main Office
Your download speed : 1234 kbps or 154.3 KB/sec.
Your upload speed : 685 kbps or 85.6 KB/sec.

Remote Office.
Your download speed : 1284 kbps or 160.5 KB/sec.
Your upload speed : 581 kbps or 72.7 KB/sec.

Main Office has 15 Users. Remote office will have 10.

Thanks
date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:54:07 -0500   author:   Gene B.

Re: ad & exchange replication   
Your bandwidth speed looks okay. A couple of things you should consider,

(1) Avoid having DC and Exchange 2003 in the same box.
(2) For only 10 users at the remote office, you can consider a consolidated 
environment, meaning, remote server doesn't need an Exchange server at all, 
perhaps only an AD for login, file share and printing.



-- 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Also, the use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified 
at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm


"Gene B."  wrote in message 
news:VIOdnaw4z77C5CDeRVn-qw@comcast.com...
> If a company has a DC at the main location running
> Windows 2003 Server Standard with DNS, WINS, DHCP, and Exchange 2003 and
> wants to put a BDC with Exchange at the remote location. Would anyone
> suggest
> upgrading their Internet service?
>
> Both locations have cable modems for theirs internet access
> Bandwidth test results are listed below.
>
> Main Office
> Your download speed : 1234 kbps or 154.3 KB/sec.
> Your upload speed : 685 kbps or 85.6 KB/sec.
>
> Remote Office.
> Your download speed : 1284 kbps or 160.5 KB/sec.
> Your upload speed : 581 kbps or 72.7 KB/sec.
>
> Main Office has 15 Users. Remote office will have 10.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:27:52 +0800   author:   Kip Ng [MSFT]

Re: ad & exchange replication   
Are you suggesting a PDC or BDC at the remote location?


"Kip Ng [MSFT]"  wrote in message 
news:%23%23NouEnEGHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Your bandwidth speed looks okay. A couple of things you should consider,
>
> (1) Avoid having DC and Exchange 2003 in the same box.
> (2) For only 10 users at the remote office, you can consider a 
> consolidated environment, meaning, remote server doesn't need an Exchange 
> server at all, perhaps only an AD for login, file share and printing.
>
>
>
> -- 
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
> rights.
> Also, the use of included script samples are subject to the terms 
> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
>
> "Gene B."  wrote in message 
> news:VIOdnaw4z77C5CDeRVn-qw@comcast.com...
>> If a company has a DC at the main location running
>> Windows 2003 Server Standard with DNS, WINS, DHCP, and Exchange 2003 and
>> wants to put a BDC with Exchange at the remote location. Would anyone
>> suggest
>> upgrading their Internet service?
>>
>> Both locations have cable modems for theirs internet access
>> Bandwidth test results are listed below.
>>
>> Main Office
>> Your download speed : 1234 kbps or 154.3 KB/sec.
>> Your upload speed : 685 kbps or 85.6 KB/sec.
>>
>> Remote Office.
>> Your download speed : 1284 kbps or 160.5 KB/sec.
>> Your upload speed : 581 kbps or 72.7 KB/sec.
>>
>> Main Office has 15 Users. Remote office will have 10.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:57:00 -0500   author:   Gene B.

Re: ad & exchange replication   
Are you suggesting a PDC or BDC at the remote location?

"Kip Ng [MSFT]"  wrote in message 
news:%23%23NouEnEGHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Your bandwidth speed looks okay. A couple of things you should consider,
>
> (1) Avoid having DC and Exchange 2003 in the same box.
> (2) For only 10 users at the remote office, you can consider a 
> consolidated environment, meaning, remote server doesn't need an Exchange 
> server at all, perhaps only an AD for login, file share and printing.
>
>
>
> -- 
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
> rights.
> Also, the use of included script samples are subject to the terms 
> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>
>
> "Gene B."  wrote in message 
> news:VIOdnaw4z77C5CDeRVn-qw@comcast.com...
>> If a company has a DC at the main location running
>> Windows 2003 Server Standard with DNS, WINS, DHCP, and Exchange 2003 and
>> wants to put a BDC with Exchange at the remote location. Would anyone
>> suggest
>> upgrading their Internet service?
>>
>> Both locations have cable modems for theirs internet access
>> Bandwidth test results are listed below.
>>
>> Main Office
>> Your download speed : 1234 kbps or 154.3 KB/sec.
>> Your upload speed : 685 kbps or 85.6 KB/sec.
>>
>> Remote Office.
>> Your download speed : 1284 kbps or 160.5 KB/sec.
>> Your upload speed : 581 kbps or 72.7 KB/sec.
>>
>> Main Office has 15 Users. Remote office will have 10.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:58:00 -0500   author:   Gene B.

Re: ad & exchange replication   
Hi,

With only 10 users there should be no need for a DC in the remote office .

Leif

"Gene B."  wrote in message 
news:2uadnRQPQt4XDiPenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Are you suggesting a PDC or BDC at the remote location?
>
> "Kip Ng [MSFT]"  wrote in message 
> news:%23%23NouEnEGHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> Your bandwidth speed looks okay. A couple of things you should consider,
>>
>> (1) Avoid having DC and Exchange 2003 in the same box.
>> (2) For only 10 users at the remote office, you can consider a 
>> consolidated environment, meaning, remote server doesn't need an Exchange 
>> server at all, perhaps only an AD for login, file share and printing.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
>> rights.
>> Also, the use of included script samples are subject to the terms 
>> specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm
>>
>>
>> "Gene B."  wrote in message 
>> news:VIOdnaw4z77C5CDeRVn-qw@comcast.com...
>>> If a company has a DC at the main location running
>>> Windows 2003 Server Standard with DNS, WINS, DHCP, and Exchange 2003 and
>>> wants to put a BDC with Exchange at the remote location. Would anyone
>>> suggest
>>> upgrading their Internet service?
>>>
>>> Both locations have cable modems for theirs internet access
>>> Bandwidth test results are listed below.
>>>
>>> Main Office
>>> Your download speed : 1234 kbps or 154.3 KB/sec.
>>> Your upload speed : 685 kbps or 85.6 KB/sec.
>>>
>>> Remote Office.
>>> Your download speed : 1284 kbps or 160.5 KB/sec.
>>> Your upload speed : 581 kbps or 72.7 KB/sec.
>>>
>>> Main Office has 15 Users. Remote office will have 10.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:43:58 +0100   author:   Leif Pedersen [MVP]

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us