|
|
|
date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:11:51 -0800,
group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.development
back
Re: Recommended Programming interface for Exchange mailboxes
Hello,
WebDAV is indeed a solution. And you are right: It not very intuitive :-) If
your application can run on the Exchange server, CdoEXM or CDOEx is another
option.
See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/813349/en-us for a list of supported
interfaces.
Take a look at the examples on MSDN
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/e2k3/e2k3/_esdk_key_tasks.asp) and
the official reference
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/e2k3/e2k3/wss_references_webdav.asp).
On my site (www.infinitec.de), I also have some scripts and free (and
unfortunately very undocumented) C# library for dealing with the webdav
issue.
Greetings,
Henning Krause
"Steve Smith" wrote in message
news:uIyxVQpUGHA.5108@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>I am updating a number of older VB6 programs that were written using CDO
>1.21 to perform various tasks against Exchange 5.5 and 2000 mailboxes. I
>plan to rewrite them in C# with Visual Studio 2005. Exchange 2003 is still
>a year away for us, so the new applications must use features and
>interfaces available in Exchange 2000.
>
> Most of these applications run on an application server and use privileged
> accounts to log on to multiple mailboxes. The applications use the dynamic
> profile capability of CDO 1.21 (servername & vblf & mailboxX500dn) to
> allow them to logon to multiple mailboxes without the need for
> pre-configured MAPI profiles.
>
> Each of these applications need the ability to read messages and their
> properties, send messages saving to the Sent Items folders, and often
> access properties of the CDO session object, address entries, folders and
> messages
>
> Using CDO 1.21 as a COM component in a C# application is probably not a
> good long-term solution for these applications.
>
> From the reading I've done, it looks like WebDAV is the best fit given my
> requirements, but I have looked at some samples, and I must say looks very
> obscure and non-intuitive.
>
> I'd be interested in any feedback from the group on a recommended approach
> to updating these applications.
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback.
>
> Steve
>
>
date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:44:05 +0200
author: Henning Krause [MVP]
|
|