Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:43:10 -0700,    group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.connectivity        back       


Exchange W2K3 via VPN WAN link   
I hope some one can help me out on this as it's driving me crazy.

I've had W2K3 running perfectly with AD in our Frankfurt office for the last 
6 months.
Management decided that they wanted our London office to access this.

Created a site-to-site VPN tunnel from Frankfurt to London (working fine)
Created a new AD controller in the London office connecting to the AD in 
Frankfurt, all within the same domain name (working fine)
Created a new W2K3 server in the London office which connected perfectly.

I can view both servers in system manager
I can create a new account/mailboxes on the AD controller in London and it's 
replicated to the AD in Frankfurt
....and vice-versa

Now the problem: I can't send emails from a mailbox hosted on the London 
server through the server in Frankfurt (vice-versa), I can see the email just 
sitting in the mail queues
...but if I move the mailbox to the Frankfurt server all is well.

the only warning message I'm getting is this:
"Message delivery to the host '192.168.xxx.xxx' failed while delivering to 
the remote domain  'charon.name.com' for the following reason: The semaphore 
timeout period has expired."
but i can't find any info about this.

Before doing this in London I setup a secondary exchange in Frankfurt which 
connected fine with mailboxes passing email through to the main server with 
no additional configuration.

Am I missing something?

thanks
--Mark
date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:43:10 -0700   author:   Mark

RE: Exchange W2K3 via VPN WAN link   
update....

after reinstalling W2K3 and W2K3E in the London office, I managed to get 
emails outbound via Frankfurt from a mailbox in London to an external 
account....but not internal.

...and no inbound to the London office from external mails.

everything was getting stuck in the queues.

dunno how I came to the conclusion that it was the "fixup protocol smtp" 
within the pix firewalls but hey call it divine inspiration after working on 
this for the last 2 days.

....but that was the problem

thanks for reading
--Mark

"Mark" wrote:

> I hope some one can help me out on this as it's driving me crazy.
> 
> I've had W2K3 running perfectly with AD in our Frankfurt office for the last 
> 6 months.
> Management decided that they wanted our London office to access this.
> 
> Created a site-to-site VPN tunnel from Frankfurt to London (working fine)
> Created a new AD controller in the London office connecting to the AD in 
> Frankfurt, all within the same domain name (working fine)
> Created a new W2K3 server in the London office which connected perfectly.
> 
> I can view both servers in system manager
> I can create a new account/mailboxes on the AD controller in London and it's 
> replicated to the AD in Frankfurt
> ...and vice-versa
> 
> Now the problem: I can't send emails from a mailbox hosted on the London 
> server through the server in Frankfurt (vice-versa), I can see the email just 
> sitting in the mail queues
> ..but if I move the mailbox to the Frankfurt server all is well.
> 
> the only warning message I'm getting is this:
> "Message delivery to the host '192.168.xxx.xxx' failed while delivering to 
> the remote domain  'charon.name.com' for the following reason: The semaphore 
> timeout period has expired."
> but i can't find any info about this.
> 
> Before doing this in London I setup a secondary exchange in Frankfurt which 
> connected fine with mailboxes passing email through to the main server with 
> no additional configuration.
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> thanks
> --Mark
date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:04:01 -0700   author:   Mark

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us