Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 11:23:09 +0000 (UTC),    group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.admin        back       


M`I 5`Persec ution ` h ow a nd why d id it start?   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= how. and why did it start? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The harassment. didn't start by itself, so someone must have been there at
the outset to give it. a firm push and set the "animals" after me. It looks
as if I was set up. in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from
university. was responsible.

>One. thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple
>prognosis: that maybe he is. right and that, despite his admitted
>mental condition,. there really is a campaign against him organised by
>now-influential. ex-students of his university.

In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter. from someone
who had known me for a few. years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his
welcome with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went. on
to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter. you wrote there". The
indication is. strongly that people I had parted from soon before nursed a
grudge against me. and were trying to cause trouble for me.

The suggestion is that Freeman might have shown the letter to other. people,
and things could have snowballed from there. Right from. the start the real
source (security. services presumed) didn't announce themselves as the
origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they. were the
originators. Think about it;. if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a
campaign against this bloke" then people might not. go along with it; but if
you say, "everyone else is getting. at this bloke because he 'deserves' it"
then people will join in. with fewer qualms.

>Why would "they" wish to. assassinate your character?

It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to. prove you're stronger. Why
would the security services expend. hundreds of thousands of pounds and more
than. six years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they
are motivated by people who knew. me at university and feel personal
animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak, and it is in. the
nature of bullies to prey on those known to be. weak; and because they can
rely on the complicity of the establishment, which the. security services
manipulate and. derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation
today, and the. British security services are intent on preventing their
humiliation becoming. reality by continuing their campaign of attempted
murder to suppress the truth. from becoming public.

1892
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 11:23:09 +0000 (UTC)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us