|
|
|
date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:08:05 +0200,
group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.admin
back
Re: Upgrade to Exchange2003
Ok, that makes little sense. You said it wasn't going to be the
mailbox server and now you just said it is.
You will need to put 2003 on the box.
What do you mean by saying it's the mailbox server for mobile users
and not OWA users? Unless you have Thousands of users you would direct
the ActiveSync, POP3, OWA, OMA, IMAP and RPC/HTTPS users to the same
box and have all the mailboxes on the back end box.
We need to discuss your ideas a little deeper.
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:29:03 +0200, "Valleyriver"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My intention is to use this server as the "mailbox server" for the mobile
>user and not the OWA users.
>
>Are someone able to answer the question?
>
>Valley
>
>
>
>"Mark Arnold [MVP]" skrev i meddelandet
>news:1uvd82hacuvlrhjnil6j1fpmm0di1jupt2@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:08:05 +0200, "Valleyriver"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi.
>> >
>> >I am going to upgrade my environment partial to Exchange2003. This server
>is
>> >not intended to work as an mailboxserver so the Front-Endserver will
>never
>> >operate with it. When I am trying to install the server I am told that
>there
>> >is an FE server that needs to be upgraded. Is there any way to perform an
>> >installation of the Exchange2003 server without upgradeing the FE Server.
>> >
>> >Valley
>> >
>> What is this server going to be doing, out of interest?
>>
>
date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:12:22 +0100
author: Mark Arnold [MVP]
Re: Upgrade to Exchange2003
I want to install an Exchange2003 and have it published for Active Sync by
using ISA.
The OWA FrontEnd has been installed with an local agent for authentication
with RSA and I am not willing
to move that for the moment. I would like to set up the first Exchange2003
without changing the configuration
of my Front-End which is installed with Exchange2000.
My idea is to demote the E2K FE shortly while doing my first E2K3
installation. By doing that I could bypass
the section of the installation where I am prevented to fullfill my E2K3
installation that due to the fact I have an E2K FE.
Is that possinble?
Valleyriver
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" skrev i meddelandet
news:9v7h82lbo505hng3fm1dsvshvpit8dlueb@4ax.com...
> Ok, that makes little sense. You said it wasn't going to be the
> mailbox server and now you just said it is.
>
> You will need to put 2003 on the box.
> What do you mean by saying it's the mailbox server for mobile users
> and not OWA users? Unless you have Thousands of users you would direct
> the ActiveSync, POP3, OWA, OMA, IMAP and RPC/HTTPS users to the same
> box and have all the mailboxes on the back end box.
>
> We need to discuss your ideas a little deeper.
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:29:03 +0200, "Valleyriver"
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >My intention is to use this server as the "mailbox server" for the mobile
> >user and not the OWA users.
> >
> >Are someone able to answer the question?
> >
> >Valley
> >
> >
> >
> >"Mark Arnold [MVP]" skrev i meddelandet
> >news:1uvd82hacuvlrhjnil6j1fpmm0di1jupt2@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:08:05 +0200, "Valleyriver"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi.
> >> >
> >> >I am going to upgrade my environment partial to Exchange2003. This
server
> >is
> >> >not intended to work as an mailboxserver so the Front-Endserver will
> >never
> >> >operate with it. When I am trying to install the server I am told that
> >there
> >> >is an FE server that needs to be upgraded. Is there any way to perform
an
> >> >installation of the Exchange2003 server without upgradeing the FE
Server.
> >> >
> >> >Valley
> >> >
> >> What is this server going to be doing, out of interest?
> >>
> >
>
date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:58:21 +0200
author: Valleyriver
|
|
