|
|
|
date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:12:50 -0500,
group: microsoft.public.exchange2000.admin
back
Re: Our Exchange database size
In news:ORTZAKfbGHA.4112@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl,
El Marko typed:
> We are running Exchange 2000 Standard.
>
> What governs the size of the database? The number of users? The
> amount of mail in their mailbox?
Yes to all, and whatever is being used by deleted item retention (based on
your settings).
> If I move more users' mail off the
> server and onto local PST files, will it create more room?
You'll get more whitespace in your database, but the files won't shrink.
>
> I am having to run the offline defrag tool on an almost monthly basis
> just to regain a little space. Is there a more long-term solution I
> can use until we upgrade?
You shouldn't be running offline defrags on a regular basis at all. Make
sure you have mailbox quotas enabled so your mailbox store can't hit the
16GB limit....and leave quite a bit of wiggle room for DIR, and just for
luck.
I would avoid PST files.....if you need temporary space, before moving to (I
presume) E2003 Enterprise or multiple servers, you might remember the public
folder stores...you get another 16GB there. You could use them for mailbox
archive.
Also, train users how to delete junk they no longer need - and to get rid of
large file attachments, esp. in sent items. That should help buy you some
time.
date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:21:00 -0400
author: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
Re: Our Exchange database size
What is "white space"?
"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
wrote in message
news:OoHh7zfbGHA.3320@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>
> In news:ORTZAKfbGHA.4112@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl,
> El Marko typed:
>> We are running Exchange 2000 Standard.
>>
>> What governs the size of the database? The number of users? The
>> amount of mail in their mailbox?
>
> Yes to all, and whatever is being used by deleted item retention (based on
> your settings).
>
>> If I move more users' mail off the
>> server and onto local PST files, will it create more room?
>
> You'll get more whitespace in your database, but the files won't shrink.
>
>>
>> I am having to run the offline defrag tool on an almost monthly basis
>> just to regain a little space. Is there a more long-term solution I
>> can use until we upgrade?
>
> You shouldn't be running offline defrags on a regular basis at all. Make
> sure you have mailbox quotas enabled so your mailbox store can't hit the
> 16GB limit....and leave quite a bit of wiggle room for DIR, and just for
> luck.
>
> I would avoid PST files.....if you need temporary space, before moving to
> (I presume) E2003 Enterprise or multiple servers, you might remember the
> public folder stores...you get another 16GB there. You could use them for
> mailbox archive.
>
> Also, train users how to delete junk they no longer need - and to get rid
> of large file attachments, esp. in sent items. That should help buy you
> some time.
>
date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:14:02 -0500
author: El Marko
Re: Our Exchange database size
In news:uSTBvNgbGHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,
El Marko typed:
> What is "white space"?
Empty space in the database files. When you or your users delete anything
from mailboxes/public folders, the actual file size of each database doesn't
shrink - Exchange will just re-use the free space within its files. You'd
have to do an offline defrag using eseutil to recover the whitespace and
shrink the file size - this is *not* something you ought to do on a regular
basis!
>
> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
> wrote in
> message news:OoHh7zfbGHA.3320@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>
>>
>> In news:ORTZAKfbGHA.4112@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl,
>> El Marko typed:
>>> We are running Exchange 2000 Standard.
>>>
>>> What governs the size of the database? The number of users? The
>>> amount of mail in their mailbox?
>>
>> Yes to all, and whatever is being used by deleted item retention
>> (based on your settings).
>>
>>> If I move more users' mail off the
>>> server and onto local PST files, will it create more room?
>>
>> You'll get more whitespace in your database, but the files won't
>> shrink.
>>>
>>> I am having to run the offline defrag tool on an almost monthly
>>> basis just to regain a little space. Is there a more long-term
>>> solution I can use until we upgrade?
>>
>> You shouldn't be running offline defrags on a regular basis at all.
>> Make sure you have mailbox quotas enabled so your mailbox store
>> can't hit the 16GB limit....and leave quite a bit of wiggle room for
>> DIR, and just for luck.
>>
>> I would avoid PST files.....if you need temporary space, before
>> moving to (I presume) E2003 Enterprise or multiple servers, you
>> might remember the public folder stores...you get another 16GB
>> there. You could use them for mailbox archive.
>>
>> Also, train users how to delete junk they no longer need - and to
>> get rid of large file attachments, esp. in sent items. That should
>> help buy you some time.
date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:48:36 -0400
author: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
|
|