Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC),    group: microsoft.public.exchange.mobility        back       


M`I'5.Per secution . pur pose in publici zing i t; censors hip in uk.* new sgroups   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= purpose in. publicizing it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a. very defensive reaction from
Usenet readers in the. UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously to
suppress. what was being said, both by breaking the rules of netiquette in
their responses on the forum, and directly by action to. revoke the account
from which the postings were. issued.

Yet the postings were. within the normal boundaries of behaviour for
uk.misc, and other less partisan spectators. did not see justice in the
censorship which. was effected, as the following excerpt shows;

:Karen Lofstrom (lofstrom@lava.net). wrote
:>It does seem that the frequency and the. size of his posts are
:>approaching net abuse.  However, IMHO, they aren't quite there. yet. If
:>his postmaster were to act in this instance, it would. raise troubling
:>censorship. issues.

The inescapable conclusion of the censorship effected on. the uk.*
newsgroups. is that the British are intent on their wrongdoing remaining
concealed, and. therefore seek to subvert and suppress freedom of speech,
not only in their own country where the media shows xenophobic. bias and
bile against all perceived enemies within and without, but also in. other
countries which have their own statutes to guarantee the basic human. right
of free. speech.

It is absolutely necessary to bring their. hate campaign out into the open
where it can be placed under scrutiny and the harassers seen for. what they
are. That is the only way of making. it impossible for the security services
to carry it out. There is a wider dimension,. though. Xenophobia as
demonstrated by British people and. institutions over the last few years
belongs to. the same stable as racial hatred. In one case, two youths on a
Tube. train made that racism explicit by referring to their victim as a
"soft toy, not up to British Standards". Doubtless. others victimize partly
on the basis of race (isn’t it odd that they chose. to torment someone who
is not ethnically English?) while expressing. their abuse in terms of
another genetic attribute, namely. mental illness. All xenophobia on a
genetic basis is wrong, but. while racial insults are illegal, abusing the
mentally ill is neither against the. law nor subject to similar condemnation
when it. is exposed.

7193
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us