Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:55:00 -0700,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.misc        back       


Multiple Information Stores   
Are there any performance advantages to having multiple information stores on 
an Exchange 2003 Server?  We were thinking about branching out each 
department into its own info store to break out brick level backups and to 
minimize down time when we do offline defrags.

Would multiple info stores help?  Are there any issues?

Thanks.
date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:55:00 -0700   author:   lsukip

Re: Multiple Information Stores   
"lsukip"  ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:6FFC698E-BB05-416D-9EC9-8EE22A4540F0@microsoft.com...

> Are there any performance advantages to having multiple
> information stores on an Exchange 2003 Server?

If they are on different physical disks, yes.
If they are on the same disk(s), no.


Massimo
date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:08:35 +0200   author:   Massimo

Re: Multiple Information Stores   
The biggest advantage is quicker backup and restore times of the individual 
stores.
Obviously its easier to restore one 30 GB store than a whole 300 GB one.

Its also easier to configure different mailbox limits, etc.

As for BLB's why bother? Recovery Storage Groups are your friend.


"lsukip"  wrote in message 
news:6FFC698E-BB05-416D-9EC9-8EE22A4540F0@microsoft.com...
> Are there any performance advantages to having multiple information stores 
> on
> an Exchange 2003 Server?  We were thinking about branching out each
> department into its own info store to break out brick level backups and to
> minimize down time when we do offline defrags.
>
> Would multiple info stores help?  Are there any issues?
>
> Thanks.
date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:45:22 -0700   author:   Martin Blackstone

Re: Multiple Information Stores   
In addition to backup and restore advantages, by starting with 4 SGs and 
leveling the stores across the SGs, you minimize contention for the log 
files.

As far as offline defrags are concerned, why are you doing them?  In an 
Exchange server enterprise environment there is no point; you do more harm 
than good.  offline defrag is a repair process and was never intended to be 
part of regular maintenance.





"lsukip"  wrote in message 
news:6FFC698E-BB05-416D-9EC9-8EE22A4540F0@microsoft.com...
> Are there any performance advantages to having multiple information stores 
> on
> an Exchange 2003 Server?  We were thinking about branching out each
> department into its own info store to break out brick level backups and to
> minimize down time when we do offline defrags.
>
> Would multiple info stores help?  Are there any issues?
>
> Thanks.
date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:15:27 -0700   author:   John Fullbright fjohn@donotspamnetappdotcom

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us