Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:57:33 -0600,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.development        back       


PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME oddity   
I am persisting journaled / enveloped messages out of exchange using 
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_DATE as part of the file naming convention.  I noticed that 
some of the emails have bogus PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_DATE values like from 2008, 
2036, etc.  Internal company mails don't seem to have this problem.  Most of 
the bizarre date emails are external or spam.   Has anone else noticed this 
issue from exchange 2003 emails?

thanks

scottm
date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:57:33 -0600   author:   Scott McFadden

Re: PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME oddity   
"Scott McFadden"  wrote in
news:ePDRCAkUHHA.1000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl: 
> I
> noticed that some of the emails have bogus PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_DATE
> values like from 2008, 2036, etc.  Internal company mails don't seem
> to have this problem.  Most of the bizarre date emails are external or
> spam.   Has anone else noticed this issue from exchange 2003 emails?

 I see this sort of problem even reading emails using Outlook -- the 
problem is that the other person's server has their clock set wrongly, and 
if it's from a spammer, chances are they don't really care too much about 
getting all the details of sending mail exactly right..

 (it can actually actually a useful spam filter -- anything that claims to 
have been originally sent more than a week ago or a day into the future is 
almost certainly junk. It's not guaranteed, possibly it got stalled 
somewhere en route, but I never saw any false positives)

 -- dan
date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:20:20 -0800   author:   Dan Mitchell

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us