In our production site we have Exchange on a backend server and OWA configured on a front-end server. Our disaster recovery site only has 1 Exchange box so I will need to put OWA on it. I'm not really comfortable doing that but I don't see any other options. Does anyone have any suggestions to make this scenario more secure?
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:29:03 -0800, Glitterati wrote: >In our production site we have Exchange on a backend server and OWA >configured on a front-end server. Our disaster recovery site only has 1 >Exchange box so I will need to put OWA on it. I'm not really comfortable >doing that but I don't see any other options. Does anyone have any >suggestions to make this scenario more secure? HOw is it not secure? OWA is running on your current backend Exchange Server in production as we speak, I gurantee it.
I understand that, but I thought OWA requests were actually going through our front end server and somehow magically making it mo betta. So essentially you're saying it's no big deal not having a front end server at the recovery site and it's fine having everything running on one server. It just seems less secure. "Andy David {MVP}" wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:29:03 -0800, Glitterati > wrote: > > >In our production site we have Exchange on a backend server and OWA > >configured on a front-end server. Our disaster recovery site only has 1 > >Exchange box so I will need to put OWA on it. I'm not really comfortable > >doing that but I don't see any other options. Does anyone have any > >suggestions to make this scenario more secure? > > HOw is it not secure? > OWA is running on your current backend Exchange Server in production > as we speak, I gurantee it. > > >
