|
|
|
date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:45:14 +1000,
group: microsoft.public.exchange.design
back
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Correct on the first assumption.
Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other location
and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all servers in that
"site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG can talk
SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between RGs you need
(RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending server in a site to
the server designated as the local "Bridgehead" on the Connector - which
then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the other end of the remote RG, and on
to the receiving server.
In this case, it appears you don't require to separate administration, so a
single AG should suffice.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"e2k3" wrote in message
news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>
> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site 1 as
> before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server will route
> them to the server in site 2 via the routine group connector and
> eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in site 2. Is it correct?
>
> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one for
> each?
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Inline.
>>
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one exchange
>>> server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and zyx.com.
>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD domain
>>> ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such a way that
>>> the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to both address
>>> spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to exchange server in site
>>> 2.
>>> How should I implement this?
>>
>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes Organization
>> name will be the same for the entire Forest. However, this does not at
>> all relate or map to SMTP domains/email addresses -think of it as just a
>> placeholder within the Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>
>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how to
>>> configure it?
>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>
>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing Groups
>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from the
>> "Connects this routing group with:"
>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing Group can
>> send over the Connector)
>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on your
>> requirements.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:13:02 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Thanks again.
I am clearer.
So it would be one AG two RG topology.
I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the Native,
right?
It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any time
while users are online?
--
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Correct on the first assumption.
>
> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all
> servers in that "site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
>
> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG can
> talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between RGs you
> need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending server in a
> site to the server designated as the local "Bridgehead" on the Connector -
> which then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the other end of the remote
> RG, and on to the receiving server.
>
> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate administration, so
> a single AG should suffice.
> --
> Bharat Suneja
> MVP - Exchange
> www.zenprise.com
> NEW blog location:
> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> "e2k3" wrote in message
> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>
>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site 1 as
>> before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server will route
>> them to the server in site 2 via the routine group connector and
>> eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in site 2. Is it
>> correct?
>>
>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one for
>> each?
>>
>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> Inline.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bharat Suneja
>>> MVP - Exchange
>>> www.zenprise.com
>>> NEW blog location:
>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and
>>>> zyx.com.
>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD domain
>>>> ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such a way that
>>>> the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to both address
>>>> spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to exchange server in site
>>>> 2.
>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>
>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes Organization
>>> name will be the same for the entire Forest. However, this does not at
>>> all relate or map to SMTP domains/email addresses -think of it as just a
>>> placeholder within the Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>>
>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how to
>>>> configure it?
>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>
>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing Groups
>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from the
>>> "Connects this routing group with:"
>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing Group
>>> can send over the Connector)
>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on your
>>> requirements.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:05:11 +1000
author: e2k3
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Where did you hear that?
As a sidenote, Exchange mixed mode simply means you can/may have Exchange
5.5 servers in the Org.
If you don't, you can switch the Org to native mode without anyone noticing.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"e2k3" wrote in message
news:OO3mkgHhGHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Thanks again.
> I am clearer.
> So it would be one AG two RG topology.
> I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
> If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the Native,
> right?
> It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
> Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any time
> while users are online?
> --
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Correct on the first assumption.
>>
>> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
>> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
>> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all
>> servers in that "site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
>>
>> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG can
>> talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between RGs you
>> need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending server in a
>> site to the server designated as the local "Bridgehead" on the
>> Connector - which then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the other end of
>> the remote RG, and on to the receiving server.
>>
>> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate administration, so
>> a single AG should suffice.
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>>
>>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site 1
>>> as before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server will
>>> route them to the server in site 2 via the routine group connector and
>>> eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in site 2. Is it
>>> correct?
>>>
>>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one for
>>> each?
>>>
>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>> Inline.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and
>>>>> zyx.com.
>>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD domain
>>>>> ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such a way that
>>>>> the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to both address
>>>>> spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to exchange server in site
>>>>> 2.
>>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>>
>>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes Organization
>>>> name will be the same for the entire Forest. However, this does not at
>>>> all relate or map to SMTP domains/email addresses -think of it as just
>>>> a placeholder within the Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>>>
>>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how to
>>>>> configure it?
>>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>>
>>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing Groups
>>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from the
>>>> "Connects this routing group with:"
>>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing Group
>>>> can send over the Connector)
>>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on your
>>>> requirements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:49:05 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Thanks again, Bharat.
I have one more question - even though it might be a setup question:
If this new DC/Exchange server on a new site of the same domain, same
organisation, but different routine group,
how can I ensure the OWA and Outlook over HTTP work? During the exchange
installation do I have chance to install a windows certificate on this new
server?
Thanks in advance.
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
news:egAQQ5HhGHA.4404@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Where did you hear that?
>
> As a sidenote, Exchange mixed mode simply means you can/may have Exchange
> 5.5 servers in the Org.
> If you don't, you can switch the Org to native mode without anyone
> noticing.
> --
> Bharat Suneja
> MVP - Exchange
> www.zenprise.com
> NEW blog location:
> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> "e2k3" wrote in message
> news:OO3mkgHhGHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks again.
>> I am clearer.
>> So it would be one AG two RG topology.
>> I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
>> If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the
>> Native, right?
>> It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
>> Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any time
>> while users are online?
>> --
>>
>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>> news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Correct on the first assumption.
>>>
>>> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
>>> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
>>> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all
>>> servers in that "site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
>>>
>>> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG can
>>> talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between RGs
>>> you need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending server in
>>> a site to the server designated as the local "Bridgehead" on the
>>> Connector - which then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the other end of
>>> the remote RG, and on to the receiving server.
>>>
>>> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate administration,
>>> so a single AG should suffice.
>>> --
>>> Bharat Suneja
>>> MVP - Exchange
>>> www.zenprise.com
>>> NEW blog location:
>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>>>
>>>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site 1
>>>> as before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server will
>>>> route them to the server in site 2 via the routine group connector and
>>>> eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in site 2. Is it
>>>> correct?
>>>>
>>>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one for
>>>> each?
>>>>
>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Inline.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and
>>>>>> zyx.com.
>>>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD domain
>>>>>> ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such a way
>>>>>> that the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to both
>>>>>> address spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to exchange
>>>>>> server in site 2.
>>>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes Organization
>>>>> name will be the same for the entire Forest. However, this does not at
>>>>> all relate or map to SMTP domains/email addresses -think of it as just
>>>>> a placeholder within the Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how to
>>>>>> configure it?
>>>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>>>
>>>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing
>>>>> Groups
>>>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from the
>>>>> "Connects this routing group with:"
>>>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing Group
>>>>> can send over the Connector)
>>>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>>>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on
>>>>> your requirements.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 11:49:38 +1000
author: e2k3
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
- OWA works out-of-the-box.
- You will need to configure RPC over HTTP.
- Cert can be installed before or after Exchange installation - the cert is
issued to the computer, not to an individual application. As such, it can be
installed at any time, and the default web site configured to use the cert.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"e2k3" wrote in message
news:OGa7PbehGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Thanks again, Bharat.
>
> I have one more question - even though it might be a setup question:
> If this new DC/Exchange server on a new site of the same domain, same
> organisation, but different routine group,
> how can I ensure the OWA and Outlook over HTTP work? During the exchange
> installation do I have chance to install a windows certificate on this new
> server?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:egAQQ5HhGHA.4404@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Where did you hear that?
>>
>> As a sidenote, Exchange mixed mode simply means you can/may have Exchange
>> 5.5 servers in the Org.
>> If you don't, you can switch the Org to native mode without anyone
>> noticing.
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>> news:OO3mkgHhGHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> Thanks again.
>>> I am clearer.
>>> So it would be one AG two RG topology.
>>> I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
>>> If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the
>>> Native, right?
>>> It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
>>> Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any
>>> time while users are online?
>>> --
>>>
>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>> news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> Correct on the first assumption.
>>>>
>>>> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
>>>> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
>>>> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all
>>>> servers in that "site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
>>>>
>>>> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG can
>>>> talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between RGs
>>>> you need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending server
>>>> in a site to the server designated as the local "Bridgehead" on the
>>>> Connector - which then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the other end
>>>> of the remote RG, and on to the receiving server.
>>>>
>>>> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate administration,
>>>> so a single AG should suffice.
>>>> --
>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site 1
>>>>> as before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server will
>>>>> route them to the server in site 2 via the routine group connector and
>>>>> eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in site 2. Is it
>>>>> correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one
>>>>> for each?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Inline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and
>>>>>>> zyx.com.
>>>>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD
>>>>>>> domain ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such a
>>>>>>> way that the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to both
>>>>>>> address spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to exchange
>>>>>>> server in site 2.
>>>>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>>>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes Organization
>>>>>> name will be the same for the entire Forest. However, this does not
>>>>>> at all relate or map to SMTP domains/email addresses -think of it as
>>>>>> just a placeholder within the Configuration naming context of an AD
>>>>>> Forest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how
>>>>>>> to configure it?
>>>>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>>>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>>>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>>>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>>>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing
>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from
>>>>>> the "Connects this routing group with:"
>>>>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing Group
>>>>>> can send over the Connector)
>>>>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>>>>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on
>>>>>> your requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:46:25 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Thsnk!
I do not have a third party certificate so that want to just install one
provided by Windows.
How should I do this?
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
news:O3FAzrkhGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>- OWA works out-of-the-box.
> - You will need to configure RPC over HTTP.
> - Cert can be installed before or after Exchange installation - the cert
> is issued to the computer, not to an individual application. As such, it
> can be installed at any time, and the default web site configured to use
> the cert.
>
> --
> Bharat Suneja
> MVP - Exchange
> www.zenprise.com
> NEW blog location:
> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> "e2k3" wrote in message
> news:OGa7PbehGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks again, Bharat.
>>
>> I have one more question - even though it might be a setup question:
>> If this new DC/Exchange server on a new site of the same domain, same
>> organisation, but different routine group,
>> how can I ensure the OWA and Outlook over HTTP work? During the exchange
>> installation do I have chance to install a windows certificate on this
>> new server?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>> news:egAQQ5HhGHA.4404@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>> Where did you hear that?
>>>
>>> As a sidenote, Exchange mixed mode simply means you can/may have
>>> Exchange 5.5 servers in the Org.
>>> If you don't, you can switch the Org to native mode without anyone
>>> noticing.
>>> --
>>> Bharat Suneja
>>> MVP - Exchange
>>> www.zenprise.com
>>> NEW blog location:
>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>> news:OO3mkgHhGHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> Thanks again.
>>>> I am clearer.
>>>> So it would be one AG two RG topology.
>>>> I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
>>>> If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the
>>>> Native, right?
>>>> It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
>>>> Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any
>>>> time while users are online?
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>> news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Correct on the first assumption.
>>>>>
>>>>> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
>>>>> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
>>>>> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all
>>>>> servers in that "site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
>>>>>
>>>>> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG
>>>>> can talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between
>>>>> RGs you need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending
>>>>> server in a site to the server designated as the local "Bridgehead" on
>>>>> the Connector - which then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the other
>>>>> end of the remote RG, and on to the receiving server.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate administration,
>>>>> so a single AG should suffice.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site
>>>>>> 1 as before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server
>>>>>> will route them to the server in site 2 via the routine group
>>>>>> connector and eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in
>>>>>> site 2. Is it correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one
>>>>>> for each?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Inline.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>>>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>>>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>>>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and
>>>>>>>> zyx.com.
>>>>>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD
>>>>>>>> domain ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such
>>>>>>>> a way that the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to
>>>>>>>> both address spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to
>>>>>>>> exchange server in site 2.
>>>>>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>>>>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes
>>>>>>> Organization name will be the same for the entire Forest. However,
>>>>>>> this does not at all relate or map to SMTP domains/email
>>>>>>> addresses -think of it as just a placeholder within the
>>>>>>> Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how
>>>>>>>> to configure it?
>>>>>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>>>>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>>>>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>>>>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>>>>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing
>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from
>>>>>>> the "Connects this routing group with:"
>>>>>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing
>>>>>>> Group can send over the Connector)
>>>>>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>>>>>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on
>>>>>>> your requirements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 09:14:18 +1000
author: newserver
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Windows does not provide a certificate as such. What it does have is the
Certificate Services component.
However, if you haven't set up CertSvc before, rather than deal with the
hassle of setting up a CA I'd look into the option of purchasing a 3rd party
cert - there are some very inexpensive CAs out there that will issue you a
cert for as low as under $50 (some even as low as $30, iirc). Look for a CA
that's trusted by Windows - you can check the list of trusted Root CAs from
the Certificates MMC snap-in or from IE.
You'll end up spending more time (which does have a cost... :) setting up
Certificate Svc yourself - not worth it for a single certificate, imo.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"newserver" wrote in message
news:eo4NKpphGHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Thsnk!
> I do not have a third party certificate so that want to just install one
> provided by Windows.
> How should I do this?
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
> news:O3FAzrkhGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>- OWA works out-of-the-box.
>> - You will need to configure RPC over HTTP.
>> - Cert can be installed before or after Exchange installation - the cert
>> is issued to the computer, not to an individual application. As such, it
>> can be installed at any time, and the default web site configured to use
>> the cert.
>>
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>> news:OGa7PbehGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>> Thanks again, Bharat.
>>>
>>> I have one more question - even though it might be a setup question:
>>> If this new DC/Exchange server on a new site of the same domain, same
>>> organisation, but different routine group,
>>> how can I ensure the OWA and Outlook over HTTP work? During the exchange
>>> installation do I have chance to install a windows certificate on this
>>> new server?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>> news:egAQQ5HhGHA.4404@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> Where did you hear that?
>>>>
>>>> As a sidenote, Exchange mixed mode simply means you can/may have
>>>> Exchange 5.5 servers in the Org.
>>>> If you don't, you can switch the Org to native mode without anyone
>>>> noticing.
>>>> --
>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>> news:OO3mkgHhGHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>> I am clearer.
>>>>> So it would be one AG two RG topology.
>>>>> I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
>>>>> If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the
>>>>> Native, right?
>>>>> It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
>>>>> Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any
>>>>> time while users are online?
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>>> news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Correct on the first assumption.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
>>>>>> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
>>>>>> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that server/all
>>>>>> servers in that "site"/location, you would create a separate AG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG
>>>>>> can talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required. Between
>>>>>> RGs you need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from sending
>>>>>> server in a site to the server designated as the local "Bridgehead"
>>>>>> on the Connector - which then forwards it to the Bridgehead on the
>>>>>> other end of the remote RG, and on to the receiving server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate
>>>>>> administration, so a single AG should suffice.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in site
>>>>>>> 1 as before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the server
>>>>>>> will route them to the server in site 2 via the routine group
>>>>>>> connector and eventually delivered to the end users' mailboxes in
>>>>>>> site 2. Is it correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one
>>>>>>> for each?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>> Inline.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>>>>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>>>>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com and
>>>>>>>>> zyx.com.
>>>>>>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD
>>>>>>>>> domain ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in such
>>>>>>>>> a way that the exchange server in site 1 still receives email to
>>>>>>>>> both address spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com to
>>>>>>>>> exchange server in site 2.
>>>>>>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>>>>>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes
>>>>>>>> Organization name will be the same for the entire Forest. However,
>>>>>>>> this does not at all relate or map to SMTP domains/email
>>>>>>>> addresses -think of it as just a placeholder within the
>>>>>>>> Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and how
>>>>>>>>> to configure it?
>>>>>>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>>>>>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>>>>>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>>>>>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>>>>>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing
>>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from
>>>>>>>> the "Connects this routing group with:"
>>>>>>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing
>>>>>>>> Group can send over the Connector)
>>>>>>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote Bridgehead
>>>>>>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on
>>>>>>>> your requirements.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:12:18 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
Re: one domain, two sites with two SMTP address spaces
Thanks for the advice.
I didn't realize this.
My had an Windows server 2003 SBS on which it has a certificate called
CertSBS. I thouht all windows come with something like this.
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
news:Orx7DrqhGHA.5096@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Windows does not provide a certificate as such. What it does have is the
> Certificate Services component.
>
> However, if you haven't set up CertSvc before, rather than deal with the
> hassle of setting up a CA I'd look into the option of purchasing a 3rd
> party cert - there are some very inexpensive CAs out there that will issue
> you a cert for as low as under $50 (some even as low as $30, iirc). Look
> for a CA that's trusted by Windows - you can check the list of trusted
> Root CAs from the Certificates MMC snap-in or from IE.
>
> You'll end up spending more time (which does have a cost... :) setting up
> Certificate Svc yourself - not worth it for a single certificate, imo.
> --
> Bharat Suneja
> MVP - Exchange
> www.zenprise.com
> NEW blog location:
> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> "newserver" wrote in message
> news:eo4NKpphGHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Thsnk!
>> I do not have a third party certificate so that want to just install one
>> provided by Windows.
>> How should I do this?
>>
>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>> news:O3FAzrkhGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>- OWA works out-of-the-box.
>>> - You will need to configure RPC over HTTP.
>>> - Cert can be installed before or after Exchange installation - the cert
>>> is issued to the computer, not to an individual application. As such, it
>>> can be installed at any time, and the default web site configured to use
>>> the cert.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bharat Suneja
>>> MVP - Exchange
>>> www.zenprise.com
>>> NEW blog location:
>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>> news:OGa7PbehGHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>> Thanks again, Bharat.
>>>>
>>>> I have one more question - even though it might be a setup question:
>>>> If this new DC/Exchange server on a new site of the same domain, same
>>>> organisation, but different routine group,
>>>> how can I ensure the OWA and Outlook over HTTP work? During the
>>>> exchange installation do I have chance to install a windows certificate
>>>> on this new server?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>> news:egAQQ5HhGHA.4404@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Where did you hear that?
>>>>>
>>>>> As a sidenote, Exchange mixed mode simply means you can/may have
>>>>> Exchange 5.5 servers in the Org.
>>>>> If you don't, you can switch the Org to native mode without anyone
>>>>> noticing.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>> news:OO3mkgHhGHA.1612@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>>> I am clearer.
>>>>>> So it would be one AG two RG topology.
>>>>>> I heard that with mixed mode only one RG per AG is supported.
>>>>>> If this is true I would have to change current mode (mixed) to the
>>>>>> Native, right?
>>>>>> It should be all right as both echange servers are 2003.
>>>>>> Would this change cause any side effects? Can I do the change at any
>>>>>> time while users are online?
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:%23NIhhAGhGHA.4892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>> Correct on the first assumption.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Re 2 Administrative Groups - AGs are for separating administrative
>>>>>>> responsibilities. If you had a separate IT dept./admin in the other
>>>>>>> location and you wanted to restrict administration of that
>>>>>>> server/all servers in that "site"/location, you would create a
>>>>>>> separate AG.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Routing Groups are for message routing - servers within the same RG
>>>>>>> can talk SMTP to each other directly, no Connectors required.
>>>>>>> Between RGs you need (RG) Connectors, and messages are routed from
>>>>>>> sending server in a site to the server designated as the local
>>>>>>> "Bridgehead" on the Connector - which then forwards it to the
>>>>>>> Bridgehead on the other end of the remote RG, and on to the
>>>>>>> receiving server.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this case, it appears you don't require to separate
>>>>>>> administration, so a single AG should suffice.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:OPzfBvFhGHA.4896@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>> Thanks very much Bharat. This is very helpful.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That means all incoming mail will be passed on to the server in
>>>>>>>> site 1 as before, but for those to the zyx.com address space the
>>>>>>>> server will route them to the server in site 2 via the routine
>>>>>>>> group connector and eventually delivered to the end users'
>>>>>>>> mailboxes in site 2. Is it correct?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should I use one administrative group for two routine groups or one
>>>>>>>> for each?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:OqnienAhGHA.1884@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>> Inline.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Bharat Suneja
>>>>>>>>> MVP - Exchange
>>>>>>>>> www.zenprise.com
>>>>>>>>> NEW blog location:
>>>>>>>>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "e2k3" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:eYv%23eYygGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Exchange Experts,
>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate your advices for this:
>>>>>>>>>> Let's say in site 1 we currently have one AD domain ABC and one
>>>>>>>>>> exchange server receiving email to SMTP address spaces xyz.com
>>>>>>>>>> and zyx.com.
>>>>>>>>>> Now we want to set up another server in site 2 and join the AD
>>>>>>>>>> domain ABC. We want to set up an exchange server in site 2 in
>>>>>>>>>> such a way that the exchange server in site 1 still receives
>>>>>>>>>> email to both address spaces but route email addressed to zyx.com
>>>>>>>>>> to exchange server in site 2.
>>>>>>>>>> How should I implement this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. should the organization name in site 2 be the same as site 1?
>>>>>>>>> There can only be 1 Exchange Org in an AD Forest, so yes
>>>>>>>>> Organization name will be the same for the entire Forest. However,
>>>>>>>>> this does not at all relate or map to SMTP domains/email
>>>>>>>>> addresses -think of it as just a placeholder within the
>>>>>>>>> Configuration naming context of an AD Forest.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2. should I use routine group connector or smtp connector? and
>>>>>>>>>> how to configure it?
>>>>>>>>> You could use either, but RGC recommended.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Setting up new SMTP Domain:
>>>>>>>>> 1. Setup External DNS zone for xyz.com
>>>>>>>>> 2. Point MX to the A record/fqdn of Exchange server in ABC domain
>>>>>>>>> 3. Setup Recipient Policy to generate email addresses for xyz.com
>>>>>>>>> 4. Create Routing Group Connector both ways between both Routing
>>>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>>>> - in General tab, select the appropriate remote Routing Group from
>>>>>>>>> the "Connects this routing group with:"
>>>>>>>>> - select local Bridgehead (default: all servers in this Routing
>>>>>>>>> Group can send over the Connector)
>>>>>>>>> - in "Remote Bridgeheads" tab, select appropriate remote
>>>>>>>>> Bridgehead
>>>>>>>>> - Look at any other options you may want to configure depending on
>>>>>>>>> your requirements.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 15:38:22 +1000
author: e2k3
|
|
