|
|
|
date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:51:02 -0700,
group: microsoft.public.exchange.design
back
Re: Site Connectors
If that's the case, you can create SMTP Connectors for the Exchange 5.5
Org's address space.
Use IMS to route messages from Exchange 5.5 to the Exchange 2000 Org's
address space.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
message news:A081C670-4A5C-49CA-88EF-E6016FEE9F54@microsoft.com...
> Yes, the Exchange 2003 server is in a new AD domain and in a new Exchange
> Organization. The Exchange 5.5 remote server is in our old Exchange
> organization and domain. When we migrate our old Exchange 5.5 server at
> Headquarters to the new Exchange Organization using ExMerge, we want to
> make
> sure we can still forward mail to the remote Exchange 5.5 server.
>
> Thanks.
> Jonathan
>
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Are they in different Exchange Organizations?
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
>> message news:245CFB64-E513-4551-B782-9B6F5317BA82@microsoft.com...
>> >I created a routing group for our Remote site, and clicked on create new
>> > routing group connector, but when I click the Remote Bridgehead tab to
>> > add
>> > a
>> > remote bridgehead the list is empty. Could this be because the Exchange
>> > 2003
>> > server and 5.5 are in different organizations?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jonathan
>> >
>> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Both can co-exist. If you use a Routing Group Connector to connect to
>> >> Exchange 5.5 Bridgehead in remote site, it should switch to RPC
>> >> communication (instead of SMTP).
>> >> --
>> >> Bharat Suneja
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> www.zenprise.com
>> >> NEW blog location:
>> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> >> ----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Jonathan Douglas" <Jonathan Douglas@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
>> >> in
>> >> message news:55AB51A2-71B1-470F-83EE-44608D3D7274@microsoft.com...
>> >> > We are migrating to a new Exchange 2003 environment at Headquarters.
>> >> > We
>> >> > currently have 2 remote sites that are connected to our Exchange 5.5
>> >> > server
>> >> > here. If we migrate to a new Exchange 2003 organization and a new
>> >> > Active
>> >> > Directory domain, can we re-create these site connectors on the new
>> >> > server
>> >> > to participate in the old Exchange 5.5 organization to foward mail
>> >> > to
>> >> > them
>> >> > or
>> >> > do these remote sites need to be migrated to Exchange 2003 in our
>> >> > new
>> >> > organization at the same time?
>> >> >
>> >> > Any insight would be appreciated,
>> >> >
>> >> > Jonathan
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:33:57 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
Re: Site Connectors
Bharat,
Is it a problem if we share the same address space, aeci.org, with the other
remote site? It is requiring me to foward mail to a Smarthost, is this the
FQDN of the remote Exchange 5.5 server?
Thanks,
Jonathan
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> If that's the case, you can create SMTP Connectors for the Exchange 5.5
> Org's address space.
> Use IMS to route messages from Exchange 5.5 to the Exchange 2000 Org's
> address space.
> --
> Bharat Suneja
> MVP - Exchange
> www.zenprise.com
> NEW blog location:
> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
> message news:A081C670-4A5C-49CA-88EF-E6016FEE9F54@microsoft.com...
> > Yes, the Exchange 2003 server is in a new AD domain and in a new Exchange
> > Organization. The Exchange 5.5 remote server is in our old Exchange
> > organization and domain. When we migrate our old Exchange 5.5 server at
> > Headquarters to the new Exchange Organization using ExMerge, we want to
> > make
> > sure we can still forward mail to the remote Exchange 5.5 server.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> Are they in different Exchange Organizations?
> >> --
> >> Bharat Suneja
> >> MVP - Exchange
> >> www.zenprise.com
> >> NEW blog location:
> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
> >> message news:245CFB64-E513-4551-B782-9B6F5317BA82@microsoft.com...
> >> >I created a routing group for our Remote site, and clicked on create new
> >> > routing group connector, but when I click the Remote Bridgehead tab to
> >> > add
> >> > a
> >> > remote bridgehead the list is empty. Could this be because the Exchange
> >> > 2003
> >> > server and 5.5 are in different organizations?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jonathan
> >> >
> >> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Both can co-exist. If you use a Routing Group Connector to connect to
> >> >> Exchange 5.5 Bridgehead in remote site, it should switch to RPC
> >> >> communication (instead of SMTP).
> >> >> --
> >> >> Bharat Suneja
> >> >> MVP - Exchange
> >> >> www.zenprise.com
> >> >> NEW blog location:
> >> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> >> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Jonathan Douglas" <Jonathan Douglas@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
> >> >> in
> >> >> message news:55AB51A2-71B1-470F-83EE-44608D3D7274@microsoft.com...
> >> >> > We are migrating to a new Exchange 2003 environment at Headquarters.
> >> >> > We
> >> >> > currently have 2 remote sites that are connected to our Exchange 5.5
> >> >> > server
> >> >> > here. If we migrate to a new Exchange 2003 organization and a new
> >> >> > Active
> >> >> > Directory domain, can we re-create these site connectors on the new
> >> >> > server
> >> >> > to participate in the old Exchange 5.5 organization to foward mail
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > them
> >> >> > or
> >> >> > do these remote sites need to be migrated to Exchange 2003 in our
> >> >> > new
> >> >> > organization at the same time?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Any insight would be appreciated,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Jonathan
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:53:05 -0700
author: Jonathan Douglas
Re: Site Connectors
If you share the address space, you have to determine which Exchange Org is
authoritative for the namespace. If it isn't the Exchange 2003 Org, you will
need to go change Recipient Policy and mark it as such by unchecking "This
Exchange Org receives all email for this address".
Once you do that, you can create the SMTP Connector for that address space
and insert the fqdn of Exchange 5.5 server running IMS as a smarthost. You
can insert fqdn or the ip address - I prefer the former. However, if you do
decide to use IP address they need to be enclosed in square brackets -
[x.x.x.x].
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
message news:DCE0A206-4416-460C-91F4-73FDFAEA8214@microsoft.com...
> Bharat,
>
> Is it a problem if we share the same address space, aeci.org, with the
> other
> remote site? It is requiring me to foward mail to a Smarthost, is this
> the
> FQDN of the remote Exchange 5.5 server?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> If that's the case, you can create SMTP Connectors for the Exchange 5.5
>> Org's address space.
>> Use IMS to route messages from Exchange 5.5 to the Exchange 2000 Org's
>> address space.
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
>> message news:A081C670-4A5C-49CA-88EF-E6016FEE9F54@microsoft.com...
>> > Yes, the Exchange 2003 server is in a new AD domain and in a new
>> > Exchange
>> > Organization. The Exchange 5.5 remote server is in our old Exchange
>> > organization and domain. When we migrate our old Exchange 5.5 server at
>> > Headquarters to the new Exchange Organization using ExMerge, we want to
>> > make
>> > sure we can still forward mail to the remote Exchange 5.5 server.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Jonathan
>> >
>> >
>> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Are they in different Exchange Organizations?
>> >> --
>> >> Bharat Suneja
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> www.zenprise.com
>> >> NEW blog location:
>> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> >> ----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote
>> >> in
>> >> message news:245CFB64-E513-4551-B782-9B6F5317BA82@microsoft.com...
>> >> >I created a routing group for our Remote site, and clicked on create
>> >> >new
>> >> > routing group connector, but when I click the Remote Bridgehead tab
>> >> > to
>> >> > add
>> >> > a
>> >> > remote bridgehead the list is empty. Could this be because the
>> >> > Exchange
>> >> > 2003
>> >> > server and 5.5 are in different organizations?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Jonathan
>> >> >
>> >> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Both can co-exist. If you use a Routing Group Connector to connect
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> Exchange 5.5 Bridgehead in remote site, it should switch to RPC
>> >> >> communication (instead of SMTP).
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Bharat Suneja
>> >> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> >> www.zenprise.com
>> >> >> NEW blog location:
>> >> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Jonathan Douglas" <Jonathan Douglas@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> >> >> wrote
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> message news:55AB51A2-71B1-470F-83EE-44608D3D7274@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> > We are migrating to a new Exchange 2003 environment at
>> >> >> > Headquarters.
>> >> >> > We
>> >> >> > currently have 2 remote sites that are connected to our Exchange
>> >> >> > 5.5
>> >> >> > server
>> >> >> > here. If we migrate to a new Exchange 2003 organization and a new
>> >> >> > Active
>> >> >> > Directory domain, can we re-create these site connectors on the
>> >> >> > new
>> >> >> > server
>> >> >> > to participate in the old Exchange 5.5 organization to foward
>> >> >> > mail
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > them
>> >> >> > or
>> >> >> > do these remote sites need to be migrated to Exchange 2003 in our
>> >> >> > new
>> >> >> > organization at the same time?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Any insight would be appreciated,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Jonathan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:01:02 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
Re: Site Connectors
Bharat,
Thanks for your reply. Our new Exchange 2003 server will be authoritive for
aeci.org namespace which we use and our remote site. Our HQ Exchange 5.5
server run the IMS, and the remote site only has a site connector. The
recipient policy on the Exchange 2003 server has aeci.org checked for
"Exchange Org receives all email for this address" Is there anyway to foward
to aeci.org address not in the Exchange 2003 address list to forward over to
the Exchange 5.5 remote site server?
Thanks,
Jonathan
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> If you share the address space, you have to determine which Exchange Org is
> authoritative for the namespace. If it isn't the Exchange 2003 Org, you will
> need to go change Recipient Policy and mark it as such by unchecking "This
> Exchange Org receives all email for this address".
>
> Once you do that, you can create the SMTP Connector for that address space
> and insert the fqdn of Exchange 5.5 server running IMS as a smarthost. You
> can insert fqdn or the ip address - I prefer the former. However, if you do
> decide to use IP address they need to be enclosed in square brackets -
> [x.x.x.x].
> --
> Bharat Suneja
> MVP - Exchange
> www.zenprise.com
> NEW blog location:
> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>
> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
> message news:DCE0A206-4416-460C-91F4-73FDFAEA8214@microsoft.com...
> > Bharat,
> >
> > Is it a problem if we share the same address space, aeci.org, with the
> > other
> > remote site? It is requiring me to foward mail to a Smarthost, is this
> > the
> > FQDN of the remote Exchange 5.5 server?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jonathan
> >
> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> >
> >> If that's the case, you can create SMTP Connectors for the Exchange 5.5
> >> Org's address space.
> >> Use IMS to route messages from Exchange 5.5 to the Exchange 2000 Org's
> >> address space.
> >> --
> >> Bharat Suneja
> >> MVP - Exchange
> >> www.zenprise.com
> >> NEW blog location:
> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
> >> message news:A081C670-4A5C-49CA-88EF-E6016FEE9F54@microsoft.com...
> >> > Yes, the Exchange 2003 server is in a new AD domain and in a new
> >> > Exchange
> >> > Organization. The Exchange 5.5 remote server is in our old Exchange
> >> > organization and domain. When we migrate our old Exchange 5.5 server at
> >> > Headquarters to the new Exchange Organization using ExMerge, we want to
> >> > make
> >> > sure we can still forward mail to the remote Exchange 5.5 server.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> > Jonathan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Are they in different Exchange Organizations?
> >> >> --
> >> >> Bharat Suneja
> >> >> MVP - Exchange
> >> >> www.zenprise.com
> >> >> NEW blog location:
> >> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> >> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote
> >> >> in
> >> >> message news:245CFB64-E513-4551-B782-9B6F5317BA82@microsoft.com...
> >> >> >I created a routing group for our Remote site, and clicked on create
> >> >> >new
> >> >> > routing group connector, but when I click the Remote Bridgehead tab
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > add
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > remote bridgehead the list is empty. Could this be because the
> >> >> > Exchange
> >> >> > 2003
> >> >> > server and 5.5 are in different organizations?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> > Jonathan
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Both can co-exist. If you use a Routing Group Connector to connect
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> Exchange 5.5 Bridgehead in remote site, it should switch to RPC
> >> >> >> communication (instead of SMTP).
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Bharat Suneja
> >> >> >> MVP - Exchange
> >> >> >> www.zenprise.com
> >> >> >> NEW blog location:
> >> >> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Jonathan Douglas" <Jonathan Douglas@discussions.microsoft.com>
> >> >> >> wrote
> >> >> >> in
> >> >> >> message news:55AB51A2-71B1-470F-83EE-44608D3D7274@microsoft.com...
> >> >> >> > We are migrating to a new Exchange 2003 environment at
> >> >> >> > Headquarters.
> >> >> >> > We
> >> >> >> > currently have 2 remote sites that are connected to our Exchange
> >> >> >> > 5.5
> >> >> >> > server
> >> >> >> > here. If we migrate to a new Exchange 2003 organization and a new
> >> >> >> > Active
> >> >> >> > Directory domain, can we re-create these site connectors on the
> >> >> >> > new
> >> >> >> > server
> >> >> >> > to participate in the old Exchange 5.5 organization to foward
> >> >> >> > mail
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > them
> >> >> >> > or
> >> >> >> > do these remote sites need to be migrated to Exchange 2003 in our
> >> >> >> > new
> >> >> >> > organization at the same time?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Any insight would be appreciated,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Jonathan
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:01:02 -0700
author: Jonathan Douglas
Re: Site Connectors
Two ways of doing this.
i) As posted earlier, you make the first system receiving the message not
authoritative for that domain and create a Connector for it and route the
mail to the remote Exchange 5.5 server running IMS. Is your Exchange 5.5 Org
running IMS at all?
The authoritative Org is responsible for finding recipients in the
directory, and if not found, send a NDR back to the sender.
If not authoritative, it can look up any routes to that address space, which
is where the Connector comes in, and delivers any mail for recipients not
resolved in local Org over the Connector to the next hop, thus passing on
the authority to deliver those messages or sending a NDR.
ii) Alternatively, create a new "secondary" address-space - let's say
@exch55.aeci.org, so all recipients in Exchange 5.5 Org have that as a
secondary/proxy address. Their default/primary address remains @aeci.org.
- next, create Contacts for Exchange 5.5 recipients in the 2003 AD so they
get the aeci.org address as primary/default and @exch55.aeci.org as
secondary. Now you can create a Connector to the Exchange 5.5 Org for the
exch55.aeci.org namespace.
Though not explicitly covering Exchange 5.5, these will apply to some
extent:
- Sharing SMTP address spaces in Exchange 2000 Server and Exchange Server
2003
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=321721
- XADM: How to Set Up Centralized SMTP Domain Sharing in Exchange 2000
Server for Independent Organizations
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;315511
- Supporting Two SMTP Mail Domains and Sharing an SMTP Mail Domain with
Another System
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/guides/E2k3TransnRouting/465d8acd-a879-4565-abcf-0edb2b09502e.mspx
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
message news:42EB8DBF-AA65-46D2-8404-0E836A2639FF@microsoft.com...
> Bharat,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Our new Exchange 2003 server will be authoritive
> for
> aeci.org namespace which we use and our remote site. Our HQ Exchange 5.5
> server run the IMS, and the remote site only has a site connector. The
> recipient policy on the Exchange 2003 server has aeci.org checked for
> "Exchange Org receives all email for this address" Is there anyway to
> foward
> to aeci.org address not in the Exchange 2003 address list to forward over
> to
> the Exchange 5.5 remote site server?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
>
> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> If you share the address space, you have to determine which Exchange Org
>> is
>> authoritative for the namespace. If it isn't the Exchange 2003 Org, you
>> will
>> need to go change Recipient Policy and mark it as such by unchecking
>> "This
>> Exchange Org receives all email for this address".
>>
>> Once you do that, you can create the SMTP Connector for that address
>> space
>> and insert the fqdn of Exchange 5.5 server running IMS as a smarthost.
>> You
>> can insert fqdn or the ip address - I prefer the former. However, if you
>> do
>> decide to use IP address they need to be enclosed in square brackets -
>> [x.x.x.x].
>> --
>> Bharat Suneja
>> MVP - Exchange
>> www.zenprise.com
>> NEW blog location:
>> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote in
>> message news:DCE0A206-4416-460C-91F4-73FDFAEA8214@microsoft.com...
>> > Bharat,
>> >
>> > Is it a problem if we share the same address space, aeci.org, with the
>> > other
>> > remote site? It is requiring me to foward mail to a Smarthost, is this
>> > the
>> > FQDN of the remote Exchange 5.5 server?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jonathan
>> >
>> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>> >
>> >> If that's the case, you can create SMTP Connectors for the Exchange
>> >> 5.5
>> >> Org's address space.
>> >> Use IMS to route messages from Exchange 5.5 to the Exchange 2000 Org's
>> >> address space.
>> >> --
>> >> Bharat Suneja
>> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> www.zenprise.com
>> >> NEW blog location:
>> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> >> ----------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Jonathan Douglas" wrote
>> >> in
>> >> message news:A081C670-4A5C-49CA-88EF-E6016FEE9F54@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Yes, the Exchange 2003 server is in a new AD domain and in a new
>> >> > Exchange
>> >> > Organization. The Exchange 5.5 remote server is in our old Exchange
>> >> > organization and domain. When we migrate our old Exchange 5.5 server
>> >> > at
>> >> > Headquarters to the new Exchange Organization using ExMerge, we want
>> >> > to
>> >> > make
>> >> > sure we can still forward mail to the remote Exchange 5.5 server.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> > Jonathan
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Are they in different Exchange Organizations?
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Bharat Suneja
>> >> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> >> www.zenprise.com
>> >> >> NEW blog location:
>> >> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Jonathan Douglas"
>> >> >> wrote
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> message news:245CFB64-E513-4551-B782-9B6F5317BA82@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> >I created a routing group for our Remote site, and clicked on
>> >> >> >create
>> >> >> >new
>> >> >> > routing group connector, but when I click the Remote Bridgehead
>> >> >> > tab
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > add
>> >> >> > a
>> >> >> > remote bridgehead the list is empty. Could this be because the
>> >> >> > Exchange
>> >> >> > 2003
>> >> >> > server and 5.5 are in different organizations?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Jonathan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Both can co-exist. If you use a Routing Group Connector to
>> >> >> >> connect
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> Exchange 5.5 Bridgehead in remote site, it should switch to RPC
>> >> >> >> communication (instead of SMTP).
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Bharat Suneja
>> >> >> >> MVP - Exchange
>> >> >> >> www.zenprise.com
>> >> >> >> NEW blog location:
>> >> >> >> www.exchangepedia.com/blog
>> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> "Jonathan Douglas" <Jonathan Douglas@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote
>> >> >> >> in
>> >> >> >> message
>> >> >> >> news:55AB51A2-71B1-470F-83EE-44608D3D7274@microsoft.com...
>> >> >> >> > We are migrating to a new Exchange 2003 environment at
>> >> >> >> > Headquarters.
>> >> >> >> > We
>> >> >> >> > currently have 2 remote sites that are connected to our
>> >> >> >> > Exchange
>> >> >> >> > 5.5
>> >> >> >> > server
>> >> >> >> > here. If we migrate to a new Exchange 2003 organization and a
>> >> >> >> > new
>> >> >> >> > Active
>> >> >> >> > Directory domain, can we re-create these site connectors on
>> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >> >> > new
>> >> >> >> > server
>> >> >> >> > to participate in the old Exchange 5.5 organization to foward
>> >> >> >> > mail
>> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > them
>> >> >> >> > or
>> >> >> >> > do these remote sites need to be migrated to Exchange 2003 in
>> >> >> >> > our
>> >> >> >> > new
>> >> >> >> > organization at the same time?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Any insight would be appreciated,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Jonathan
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:52:20 -0700
author: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
|
|
