Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity        back       


Client connections on port 1188   
Hi,

My Exchange 2003 organization has several backend servers on different sites 
and a connector server through which external mail is sent. This server has 
no mailboxes in its store but routes incoming mail to the appropriate backend 
server.

When I use NETSTAT on this connector server I see that a lot of Outlook 2003 
client have a connection to this server on port 1188. How is this possible, 
because client send mail through their own backend server and should have no 
need for a connection to this connector server.

Best regards,
Chiel Varkevisser
Netherlands.
date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700   author:   ChielV

Re: Client connections on port 1188   
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700, ChielV
 wrote:

>Hi,
>
>My Exchange 2003 organization has several backend servers on different sites 
>and a connector server through which external mail is sent. This server has 
>no mailboxes in its store but routes incoming mail to the appropriate backend 
>server.
>
>When I use NETSTAT on this connector server I see that a lot of Outlook 2003 
>client have a connection to this server on port 1188. How is this possible, 
>because client send mail through their own backend server and should have no 
>need for a connection to this connector server.
>
>Best regards,
>Chiel Varkevisser
>Netherlands.

Could be anything but if you haven't configured this box as an FE (you
should) you will see Outlook clients connecting to it for system
folder (free/busy etc. etc.) connections.
Make it an FE. Remove the PF store (leave the private store since you
need to at for SMTP routing) and then give it a quick reboot to make
sure everything knows that it's now an FE.
date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:09:12 -0400   author:   Mark Arnold [MVP]

Re: Client connections on port 1188   
What are the risks involved when I do this action in my production 
environment? 

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:05:01 -0700, ChielV
>  wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >My Exchange 2003 organization has several backend servers on different sites 
> >and a connector server through which external mail is sent. This server has 
> >no mailboxes in its store but routes incoming mail to the appropriate backend 
> >server.
> >
> >When I use NETSTAT on this connector server I see that a lot of Outlook 2003 
> >client have a connection to this server on port 1188. How is this possible, 
> >because client send mail through their own backend server and should have no 
> >need for a connection to this connector server.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Chiel Varkevisser
> >Netherlands.
> 
> Could be anything but if you haven't configured this box as an FE (you
> should) you will see Outlook clients connecting to it for system
> folder (free/busy etc. etc.) connections.
> Make it an FE. Remove the PF store (leave the private store since you
> need to at for SMTP routing) and then give it a quick reboot to make
> sure everything knows that it's now an FE.
>
date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:18:04 -0700   author:   ChielV

Re: Client connections on port 1188   
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:18:04 -0700, ChielV
 wrote:

>What are the risks involved when I do this action in my production 
>environment? 
>
Dunno. I'm not on your change control board.
I don't know what you've accidentally replicated to the bridgehead
server and I don't know why the person who designed your Exchange
environment either a) didn't do the job right and have the bridgehead
made an FE, b) the implementation people didn't do their job right and
make it an FE in accordance with a good design or c) someone was doing
something with that server that required a PF to be mounted.
date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:31:18 -0400   author:   Mark Arnold [MVP]

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us