Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:13:37 GMT,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.clustering        back       


What kind of down time will I have Clustering my Exchange 2003 Enterprise Server ?   
Hello

I upgraded to a new Exchange 2007 Enterprise server at the main office. Now
my CIO wants me to setup a another Excahnge 2007 Enterprise Server at a COLO
as a cluster for failover if the Exchange 2007 Server at the Main office has
a power outage or network outage.
When I set this server up as a cluster node A with the the new Windows 2003
R2 Server for node B, What kind downtime will I have, should I doit after
hours ?

Thanks
Tony

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:13:37 GMT   author:   unknown

Re: What kind of down time will I have Clustering my Exchange 2003 Enterprise Server ?   
- Assuming you want to implement either CCR or SCC cluster-- you can't add 
an existing Exchange Server to a cluster (or create a new cluster from an 
existing server) without removing Exchange Server 2007.
- The recommended solution for site resilience is SCR. You can use SCR with 
clustered/non-clustered source Exchange servers, and replicate Storage 
Groups to clustered/non-clustered (SCR) targets. This does not involve any 
down time.
- However, SCR does not provide "failover" from source to target, unlike 
clusters. SCR targets need to be activated manually. Generally speaking, 
it's a good idea to have manual intervention and let an administrator decide 
to activate a remote site/server. If that's your goal, SCR will work.
- If not, and you're considering setting up CCR - using Windows Server 2008 
Failover Clustering is recommended because of its ability to span IP 
subnets. (Both subnets have to be associated with the same AD Site).

-- 
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------



 wrote in message news:1206561936_616@news.newsfeeds.com...
> Hello
>
> I upgraded to a new Exchange 2007 Enterprise server at the main office. 
> Now
> my CIO wants me to setup a another Excahnge 2007 Enterprise Server at a 
> COLO
> as a cluster for failover if the Exchange 2007 Server at the Main office 
> has
> a power outage or network outage.
> When I set this server up as a cluster node A with the the new Windows 
> 2003
> R2 Server for node B, What kind downtime will I have, should I doit after
> hours ?
>
> Thanks
> Tony
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet 
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ 
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption 
> =----
date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:38:20 -0700   author:   Bharat Suneja [MVP]

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us