Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:37:09 +0100,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.clustering        back       


IP-Adress for furrther services   
Hej,

we are successfully using Exchange2003 SP2 in W2003-Cluster (SP1) .

We are going to define a second IMAP-Service for Exchange.Therefor we 
created another IP-clusterressource and defined a clusterdependecy for this 
new IPAddress. All cluster ressources are online
When we are gonig te define the second IMAP-Service in Exchange, we can't 
select this new IP-Adderess as IP for the new service.
Only the cluster-IP is offered.

And as usual:   in our testenvironment this works fine..

Any idea what  we did wrong or what we missed to do?

Thanks
Ruth
date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:37:09 +0100   author:   Ruth Thieme

Re: IP-Adress for furrther services   
We just learnt something new (Q293510):

then new IP has to be listed with then Exchange network name in DNS.  Thisi 
s not done in our DNS -why???

Ruth

"Ruth Thieme"  schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:uPAZCtwWHHA.4720@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Hej,
>
> we are successfully using Exchange2003 SP2 in W2003-Cluster (SP1) .
>
> We are going to define a second IMAP-Service for Exchange.Therefor we 
> created another IP-clusterressource and defined a clusterdependecy for 
> this new IPAddress. All cluster ressources are online
> When we are gonig te define the second IMAP-Service in Exchange, we can't 
> select this new IP-Adderess as IP for the new service.
> Only the cluster-IP is offered.
>
> And as usual:   in our testenvironment this works fine..
>
> Any idea what  we did wrong or what we missed to do?
>
> Thanks
> Ruth
>
date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:11:24 +0100   author:   Ruth Thieme

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us