Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:56:05 +0100,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.admin        back       


Server Specification   
Hi all

Anyone able to share knowledge on server specification please?

I have been offered the following spec for running Exchange Server 2007 on 
Windows Server 2008

Hewlett Packard -  Rack ProLiant DL360 G5 Xeon 5440 2830-2x6MB/1333 Quad 
Core, HP SFF SAS
Integrated P400i/256 RAID Controller
2GB Memory 667 MHz - PC2-5300
Network adapter - PCI Express x4 - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit 
Ethernet - Ethernet Ports : 2 x Gigabit Ethernet
146GB Pluggable SAS SFF 10,000 rpm Universal Hard Drive x 4
ProLiant DL360 G5 700W Hot Plug Redundant Power Supply with IEC cord

The server will be in a domain environment with upto 50 clients.
The current database sizes under exchange 2003 are Priv1 - 19Gb, Pub1 - 
28Gb.
How does the above stack up as a specification for a server expected to last 
5 years?
Any more information needed for comment?


TIA

Phil
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:56:05 +0100   author:   TheScullster

Re: Server Specification   
Not bad, but I would do a DL380 with a min of 6 disks.
I would also up the RAM to a min of 4 GB.

If the DL380 is out of your price range, at least up the RAM in this one.

"TheScullster"  wrote in message 
news:TfGdnbzpjL1YpfPVRVnyhgA@eclipse.net.uk...
> Hi all
>
> Anyone able to share knowledge on server specification please?
>
> I have been offered the following spec for running Exchange Server 2007 on 
> Windows Server 2008
>
> Hewlett Packard -  Rack ProLiant DL360 G5 Xeon 5440 2830-2x6MB/1333 Quad 
> Core, HP SFF SAS
> Integrated P400i/256 RAID Controller
> 2GB Memory 667 MHz - PC2-5300
> Network adapter - PCI Express x4 - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit 
> Ethernet - Ethernet Ports : 2 x Gigabit Ethernet
> 146GB Pluggable SAS SFF 10,000 rpm Universal Hard Drive x 4
> ProLiant DL360 G5 700W Hot Plug Redundant Power Supply with IEC cord
>
> The server will be in a domain environment with upto 50 clients.
> The current database sizes under exchange 2003 are Priv1 - 19Gb, Pub1 - 
> 28Gb.
> How does the above stack up as a specification for a server expected to 
> last 5 years?
> Any more information needed for comment?
>
>
> TIA
>
> Phil
>
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 08:02:45 -0700   author:   Martin Blackstone [MVP]

Re: Server Specification   
I am also looking for a server to deploy Exchange 2007 and from what i 
learned memory is a big deal with 2k7, so if you want a server for the 
next 5y i would go for 4Gb as Martin said.
Also what RAID will you use?

Filipe Matias



TheScullster wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Anyone able to share knowledge on server specification please?
> 
> I have been offered the following spec for running Exchange Server 2007 on 
> Windows Server 2008
> 
> Hewlett Packard -  Rack ProLiant DL360 G5 Xeon 5440 2830-2x6MB/1333 Quad 
> Core, HP SFF SAS
> Integrated P400i/256 RAID Controller
> 2GB Memory 667 MHz - PC2-5300
> Network adapter - PCI Express x4 - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit 
> Ethernet - Ethernet Ports : 2 x Gigabit Ethernet
> 146GB Pluggable SAS SFF 10,000 rpm Universal Hard Drive x 4
> ProLiant DL360 G5 700W Hot Plug Redundant Power Supply with IEC cord
> 
> The server will be in a domain environment with upto 50 clients.
> The current database sizes under exchange 2003 are Priv1 - 19Gb, Pub1 - 
> 28Gb.
> How does the above stack up as a specification for a server expected to last 
> 5 years?
> Any more information needed for comment?
> 
> 
> TIA
> 
> Phil 
> 
>
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:17:40 +0100   author:   Filipe Matias

Re: Server Specification   
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:17:40 +0100, Filipe Matias
 wrote:

>I am also looking for a server to deploy Exchange 2007 and from what i 
>learned memory is a big deal with 2k7, so if you want a server for the 
>next 5y i would go for 4Gb as Martin said.

With 2007, I would put a minimum of 8GB. It will use it.




>Also what RAID will you use?
>
>Filipe Matias
>
>
>
>TheScullster wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> Anyone able to share knowledge on server specification please?
>> 
>> I have been offered the following spec for running Exchange Server 2007 on 
>> Windows Server 2008
>> 
>> Hewlett Packard -  Rack ProLiant DL360 G5 Xeon 5440 2830-2x6MB/1333 Quad 
>> Core, HP SFF SAS
>> Integrated P400i/256 RAID Controller
>> 2GB Memory 667 MHz - PC2-5300
>> Network adapter - PCI Express x4 - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit 
>> Ethernet - Ethernet Ports : 2 x Gigabit Ethernet
>> 146GB Pluggable SAS SFF 10,000 rpm Universal Hard Drive x 4
>> ProLiant DL360 G5 700W Hot Plug Redundant Power Supply with IEC cord
>> 
>> The server will be in a domain environment with upto 50 clients.
>> The current database sizes under exchange 2003 are Priv1 - 19Gb, Pub1 - 
>> 28Gb.
>> How does the above stack up as a specification for a server expected to last 
>> 5 years?
>> Any more information needed for comment?
>> 
>> 
>> TIA
>> 
>> Phil 
>> 
>>
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:29:29 -0400   author:   Andy David {MVP}

Re: Server Specification   
"Andy David {MVP}"  ha scritto nel 
messaggio news:1fns64940kd90i5iq89frr7iq8posoruhk@4ax.com...

>>I am also looking for a server to deploy Exchange 2007 and from what i
>>learned memory is a big deal with 2k7, so if you want a server for the
>>next 5y i would go for 4Gb as Martin said.
>
> With 2007, I would put a minimum of 8GB. It will use it.

It will actually use *anything* and *everything* you throw at it... 
regardless of actual usage.


Massimo
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:49:38 +0200   author:   Massimo

Re: Server Specification   
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:49:38 +0200, "Massimo"  wrote:

>"Andy David {MVP}"  ha scritto nel 
>messaggio news:1fns64940kd90i5iq89frr7iq8posoruhk@4ax.com...
>
>>>I am also looking for a server to deploy Exchange 2007 and from what i
>>>learned memory is a big deal with 2k7, so if you want a server for the
>>>next 5y i would go for 4Gb as Martin said.
>>
>> With 2007, I would put a minimum of 8GB. It will use it.
>
>It will actually use *anything* and *everything* you throw at it... 
>regardless of actual usage.

Not sure what that means, but ok.


>
>
>Massimo
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:55:32 -0400   author:   Andy David {MVP}

Re: Server Specification   
"Filipe Matias"  wrote in message 
news:%23DDNlnf3IHA.776@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am also looking for a server to deploy Exchange 2007 and from what i 
>learned memory is a big deal with 2k7, so if you want a server for the next 
>5y i would go for 4Gb as Martin said.
> Also what RAID will you use?
>

Actually if I had my druthers, I would go with 8. But 4 is way better than 
2!
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:19:47 -0700   author:   Martin Blackstone [MVP]

Re: Server Specification   
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:19:47 -0700, "Martin Blackstone [MVP]"
 wrote:

>
>"Filipe Matias"  wrote in message 
>news:%23DDNlnf3IHA.776@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>I am also looking for a server to deploy Exchange 2007 and from what i 
>>learned memory is a big deal with 2k7, so if you want a server for the next 
>>5y i would go for 4Gb as Martin said.
>> Also what RAID will you use?
>>
>
>Actually if I had my druthers, I would go with 8. But 4 is way better than 
>2! 


Fingers?
date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:40:00 -0400   author:   Andy David {MVP}

Re: Server Specification   
"Andy David {MVP}"  wrote in message 
news:qjrs64dgdkq8d7bsuosbvphfc7j6hpq2ur@4ax.com...

>>Actually if I had my druthers, I would go with 8. But 4 is way better than
>>2!
>
>
> Fingers?
>
If you insist
date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 12:05:04 -0700   author:   Martin Blackstone [MVP]

Re: Server Specification   
TheScullster wrote:

> nt DL360 G5 700W Hot Plug Redundant Power Supply with IEC cor

1) I would use 4G instead of 2G
2) It will be preferable to install 6 disks and seperate OS / Logs / Data to
diffrent arrays (you would need HP expansion cable to add 2 more disks).
3) Make sure to install 2 PS for redundancy.
date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:48:38 +0300   author:   Ariel Moskovich

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us