|
|
|
date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:44:59 +0300,
group: microsoft.public.exchange.admin
back
Re: Moving exchange server 2003 sp2 (additional dc, 2003 r2) to new
hardware
On Jun 20, 1:36 pm, "Milind Naphade"
wrote:
> I would suggest you to referhttp://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=297289in
> stead of the technet document you found out.
> Additionally, deploying and exchange server on a box which is a domain
> controller already is not a good practice. Microsoft does not recommend to
> have an exchange server installed on the server which is a domain controller
> also.
>
> --
> -
> Milind Naphade.
>
> "Bugs" <celebimehmet«no spam»@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:OFR2tEq0IHA.2084@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
>
>
> > Hi, we have an exchange 2003 sp2 server running on win 2003 srv r2.
> > That machine is also running as additional dc.
> > Now we're planing to move it to an new machine. And we want to configure
> > this new exchange machine as additional dc.
>
> > I've read some document's on ms technet like this:
> >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997176.aspx
>
> > But i don't understand an detail in this operation;
> > Is there a difference to do this operation on the additional domain
> > controller running exchange 2003, or is this the same like moving from
> > member server to new member server ?
>
> > Note: Excuse me for bad english.
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Mehmet- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Adding to what Milind quoted, MS does not recommend Exchng box to be
on a DC, however if u come across a situation where Exchn box HAS to
be on a DC - ensure that the DC is converted to a GC to avoid further
complications of services related Exchng not starting up.
Apart from the above concern, you dont have to beat your head about
any other issues.
date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
author: Tushar Shah
|
|