Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Exchange
2000.active.directory
2000.admin
2000.announcements
2000.app.conversion
2000.applications
2000.clients
2000.clustering
2000.connectivity
2000.development
2000.documentation
2000.general
2000.information.store
2000.interop
2000.kms
2000.misc
2000.protocols
2000.realtime.collabo.
2000.setup
2000.transport
2000.win2000
admin
application.conversion
applications
clients
clustering
connectivity
design
development
misc
mobility
setup
tools
  
 
date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:13:41 -0400,    group: microsoft.public.exchange.admin        back       


Re: subject alternate names   
Just in case anyone else runs across this thread while Googling in the
future:

I found that you can indeed create a self signed SSL certificate for
OWA 2007 using subject alternate names that will work.  

You can generate your cert request here:

https://www.digicert.com/easy-csr/exchange2007.htm

And this page, http://exchangeninjas.com/cascert walks you thru using
the three powershell commands needed to apply the self signed
certificate.

If you use SANs, you must include the CN (common name) for your site
as one of the SANs.  This is because apparently using SANs at all
causes the certificate to ignore the CN field and match only from the
list of SANs.

This does still leave the problem that your users will get a complaint
about 'the security certificate was issued by a company you have not
chosen to trust.'  This is the expected behavior as a self signed
certificate is of course not been issued by a vendor like GoDaddy,
etc.  This can be taken care of by the user then adding the
certificate to their local trusted root CAs.  If you can get a user to
understand this of course.

For this reason, as Andy said, its best go just go with a third party
SSL certificate so that your users don't see this and so that
everything is clean.

So, self signed OWA SSL certificates using SANs with Exchange 2007 are
possible but not the cleanest of solutions.  I would only do this if,
for some reason, you cannot get the approval of a third party SSL
certificate thru the hurdles.

Third party is the way to go and will provide the best security as
well as the cleanest user experience.

Thanks
Drew
date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:13:41 -0400   author:   Drew

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us