Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
SQL
ce
clients
clustering
connect
datamining
datawarehouse
dts
fulltext
jdbcdriver
msde
mseq
newusers
notificationsvcs
odbc
olap
programming
replication
reportingsvcs
security
securitytools
server
setup
sqlxml.viewmapper
tools
xml
  
 
date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:47:22 -0500,    group: microsoft.public.sqlserver.ce        back       


SQLServerCE 3.1 and Vista Ultimate   
I've been struggling to get the prerequisites correct for some time now.



What I have:

I have Visual Studio 2005 Professional

   Express editions of VS do not suit my needs



I have Vista Ultimate 64 bit as my OS, on my development machine



What I need:

To embed a SQL database within my application

    preferably integrated with my IDE



What I want to avoid:

Spending $700 to upgrade VS for the purposes of one project

Having to develop on a differant OS for the purposes of one project



My problem:

Upon a fresh install of Visual Studio 2005 on my development machine, SQL 
Server Compact edition does not appear in the refrences list in the C# IDE, 
nor does it appear as an option when creating a DB through server explorer, 
nor do any of the other integrated features seem to work when following the 
documentation.



However, when I install on my laptop which happens to run Vista 32 bit, 
everything is fine, appears where expected and works as expected.



Why cannot I not develop using SQL Server Compact 3.1 and VS 2005 just 
because I am running a 64 bit OS? Vista Ultimate was the most expensive 
option, I'd expect it to be the superset of eveything. Am I missing 
something?



I also tryed SQL Server 3.5, but it will not integrate with VS 2005 and 
requires VS 2008 for all features.



I develop other projects on this machine and environment with no problem at 
all, why such problems when it comes to SQL Server? Did MS just expect all 
developers to drop $800 for an upgrade along with $600 for an OS? I do not 
run a company, I don't have that kind of money.
date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:47:22 -0500   author:   Christopher Pisz

RE: SQLServerCE 3.1 and Vista Ultimate   
Look at this detailed guide to get the all required components right:
http://blogs.msdn.com/stevelasker/archive/2007/08/07/configuring-visual-studio-2005-for-use-wtih-sql-server-2005-compact-edition.aspx

-- 
Erik Ejlskov Jensen - MCTS: Mobile App Dev


"Christopher Pisz" wrote:

> I've been struggling to get the prerequisites correct for some time now.
> 
> 
> 
> What I have:
> 
> I have Visual Studio 2005 Professional
> 
>    Express editions of VS do not suit my needs
> 
> 
> 
> I have Vista Ultimate 64 bit as my OS, on my development machine
> 
> 
> 
> What I need:
> 
> To embed a SQL database within my application
> 
>     preferably integrated with my IDE
> 
> 
> 
> What I want to avoid:
> 
> Spending $700 to upgrade VS for the purposes of one project
> 
> Having to develop on a differant OS for the purposes of one project
> 
> 
> 
> My problem:
> 
> Upon a fresh install of Visual Studio 2005 on my development machine, SQL 
> Server Compact edition does not appear in the refrences list in the C# IDE, 
> nor does it appear as an option when creating a DB through server explorer, 
> nor do any of the other integrated features seem to work when following the 
> documentation.
> 
> 
> 
> However, when I install on my laptop which happens to run Vista 32 bit, 
> everything is fine, appears where expected and works as expected.
> 
> 
> 
> Why cannot I not develop using SQL Server Compact 3.1 and VS 2005 just 
> because I am running a 64 bit OS? Vista Ultimate was the most expensive 
> option, I'd expect it to be the superset of eveything. Am I missing 
> something?
> 
> 
> 
> I also tryed SQL Server 3.5, but it will not integrate with VS 2005 and 
> requires VS 2008 for all features.
> 
> 
> 
> I develop other projects on this machine and environment with no problem at 
> all, why such problems when it comes to SQL Server? Did MS just expect all 
> developers to drop $800 for an upgrade along with $600 for an OS? I do not 
> run a company, I don't have that kind of money.
> 
> 
>
date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:41:02 -0700   author:   ErikEJ

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us