Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
other
informationbridge
office.intranets
office.misc
office.setup
office.xml
officeupdate
onenote
photodraw.discussion
powerpoint
producer
proj.standard&server
project
project.developer
project.pro_and_serve
project.server
project.vba
project2000
publisher
publisher.prepress
publisher.programming
publisher.webdesign
visio
visio.createshapes
visio.database.modeling
visio.dev.diagrams
visio.dev.shapesheet
visio.dev.vba
visio.dev.vc
visio.developer
visio.general
visio.installation
visio.printing
visio.software.modeling
visio.troubleshoot
  
 
date: 14 Mar 2005 08:15:53 -0800,    group: microsoft.public.project.standard_and_server        back       


Administrative Template   
Using Project Server/Project Professional 2003 with Service Pack 1

Setting up an Admin project based off the Administrative Template and
using the "Notify your manager of time you will not be available for
project work" works mostly like I expect.  The main exception is in the
following scenario:
1.  Team member uses the notify link and puts 8 hours of vacation for
3/28 and 3/29 and then submits (16 hours total).
2.  Project manager approves and then republishes the Admin project.
(So far this is what I expect)

3.  Team member now realizes that 3/28 and 3/29 are not the correct
days and needs to make it be 4/4, 4/5 and 4/6.
4.  Team member again uses the notify link and zeros out the time for
3/28 and 3/29 since that is no longer correct and then puts 8 hours in
for 4/4 - 4/6 (24 hours total) and then submits.
5.  Project manager now sees that 3/28 and 3/29 have been zeroed out
and 4/4 - 4/6 have 8 hours each day.
6.  Project manager accepts the correction.

(This is where it does not act like I would expect)
7.  Once the manager accepts the correction, the Admin project now
shows that the team member is going to be taking vacation on 3/28,
3/29, 4/4, 4/5 and 4/6.  Now it shows that the team member is going to
be taking 40 hours of vacation instead of only 24.

Is it supposed to work this way or am I missing a step?  I expected
3/28 and 3/29 to be zeroed out since that is what the team member had
put in.  I realize the project manager can adjust the Admin project
before he republishes so that 3/28 and 3/29 are zeroed out, but that
defeats the purpose of accepting the task change that the team member
submitted.

Thanks,

Victor
date: 14 Mar 2005 08:15:53 -0800   author:   Victor

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us