|
|
|
date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:53:00 -0700,
group: microsoft.public.project.developer
back
Re: Time Phased Actual Work updates for Project Resources?
Hello Subramanian,
For the future, be aware that this newsgroup is specifically for
development questions. Your question would be better suited to
microsoft.public.project.server.
What you refer to as "Project Resources" are technically called "Local
Resources". Status updates are not permitted for Local Resources, only
Enterprise Resources. The inability to support different rates for
different projects is one of the limitations of Enterprise Resources.
While this limitation is somewhat mitigated by cost rate tables, they
are not usually sufficient.
From the wording of your post, I'm inferring that these Local Resources
are being used to represent external resources, most likely from
differing vendors. I also see that you have been creating separate
Carpenter resources in the Enterprise Resource Pool to represent
different Carpenters. I'm sorry to say that this is probably your best
option - IMHO there are no truly viable alternatives.
Hope that helps,
Steve
--
Stephen Sanderlin
Principal Consultant
MSProjectExperts
For Project Server Consulting: http://www.msprojectexperts.com
For Project Server Training: http://www.projectservertraining.com
Read my blog at: http://www.projectserverhelp.com/
Join the community at: http://forums.epmfaq.com
"Subramanian Vasudevan"
wrote in message
news:AE566E74-813C-4441-8899-B7F1C1AEA2AC@microsoft.com:
> We have a requirement that the Standard Rate of all our resources must be
> allowed to vary from Project to Project. For example, suppose we define a
> Labour resource called 'Carpenter'. For Project1, his would have quoted his
> standard rate as $41/hour. But for another project, Project2, another
> Carpenter might quote a standard rate of $50/hour. This all leads us to
> choose Project Resources over Enterprise Resources. So ideally there would be
> one Carpenter resource for each project.
>
> But we also have the requirement of being able to make Tie-Phased actuals
> updates on the work done by these 2 carpenters for the 2 projects. Statusing
> Updates is not possible on Project Resources, which is why we are stumped.
>
> As of now, we are creating a separate Carpenter Resource for each project
> (name suffixed with some unique ProjectID) in the Enterprise Resource Pool
> for whom the standard rates differ. This we feel is cluttering up our
> Enterprise Resource Pool. Is there a better way of doing this? Is there a way
> to record time-phased actual work data for Project Resources? We are able to
> do it from Project Professional because it can handle the detailed schedule
> of the plan.
date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:27:51 +0000
author: Stephen Sanderlin stephen NS-DOT sanderlin A-NS-T msprojectexperts DOT-NS com
|
|