Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Access
3rdpartyusrgrp
access
activexcontrol
adp.sqlserver
commandbarsui
conversion
dataaccess.pages
developers.toolkitode
devtoolkits
externaldata
forms
formscoding
gettingstarted
internet
interopoledde
macros
modulescoding
modulesdaovba
modulesdaovba.ado
multiuser
odbcclientsvr
queries
replication
reports
security
setupconfig
tablesdbdesign
  
 
date: Fri, 23 May 2008 06:47:59 -0700 (PDT),    group: microsoft.public.access.replication        back       


Replication from a Replica with multiple Users   
On a computer with a single replica can multiple people use this same
replica. Either in between synchronisation or at the same time?
date: Fri, 23 May 2008 06:47:59 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Robin9876

Re: Replication from a Replica with multiple Users   
Robin9876  wrote in
news:80a5e7a8-9fa3-4ed3-870c-0124652fcef1@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.co
m: 

> On a computer with a single replica can multiple people use this
> same replica. Either in between synchronisation or at the same
> time? 

Yes, of course. That answer assumes several things, though:

1. the app is split, with only the back end data tables being
replicated (each user would have their own copy of the
non-replicated front end). 

2. memo fields are edited unbound, so that the risk of corruption
during a synch is minimized. 

-- 
David W. Fenton                  http://www.dfenton.com/ 
usenet at dfenton dot com    http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
date: 23 May 2008 21:31:26 GMT   author:   David W. Fenton lid

Re: Replication from a Replica with multiple Users   
Is the data changes in a single replica identified by user?

Do you know of any MSDN articles about how the replication changes are
stored?

On 23 May, 22:31, "David W. Fenton" <XXXuse...@dfenton.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Robin9876  wrote innews:80a5e7a8-9fa3-4ed3-870c-0124652fcef1@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.co
> m:
>
> > On a computer with a single replica can multiple people use this
> > same replica. Either in between synchronisation or at the same
> > time?
>
> Yes, of course. That answer assumes several things, though:
>
> 1. the app is split, with only the back end data tables being
> replicated (each user would have their own copy of the
> non-replicated front end).
>
> 2. memo fields are edited unbound, so that the risk of corruption
> during a synch is minimized.
>
> --
> David W. Fenton                  http://www.dfenton.com/
> usenet at dfenton dot com    http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
date: Tue, 27 May 2008 04:42:48 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Robin9876

Re: Replication from a Replica with multiple Users   
Robin9876  wrote in
news:ecda5ae3-8319-43f6-828b-1747f32434bb@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
: 

> Is the data changes in a single replica identified by user?

No, unless you actually include data in the records that indicate
which user updated them. 

> Do you know of any MSDN articles about how the replication changes
> are stored?

I don't understand the question. What do you mean by "how the
replication changes are stored"? 

They *aren't* stored. Each replica includes the data in the state it
was left at the last edit. Now, the generations are kept track of,
and the lineage of the updates is tracked, but this is not exposed
to the user or programmer. 

-- 
David W. Fenton                  http://www.dfenton.com/ 
usenet at dfenton dot com    http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
date: 28 May 2008 00:46:25 GMT   author:   David W. Fenton lid

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us