Ureader.com  
Microsoft software help and Community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
Access
3rdpartyusrgrp
access
activexcontrol
adp.sqlserver
commandbarsui
conversion
dataaccess.pages
developers.toolkitode
devtoolkits
externaldata
forms
formscoding
gettingstarted
internet
interopoledde
macros
modulescoding
modulesdaovba
modulesdaovba.ado
multiuser
odbcclientsvr
queries
replication
reports
security
setupconfig
tablesdbdesign
  
 
date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:55:02 GMT,    group: microsoft.public.access.conversion        back       


How many user licenses required for SQL Server BE   
I have an Access front end application that links to Access Back end tables
located on a server.  The Front End application is used by approx. 50 users,
some internal and some thru Term Server.  I am planning to convert the
Backend access database to SQL server, but I am confused as to the number of
user licenses I would need to purchase.  If I create pass through queries and
use one login id to SQL server for the Front end to use to access the SQL
Server BE tables, will I need a user license for all 50 users or just one for
the FE application?

What about if I link the BE SQL Server tables to the FE?   Will I need 50
licenses or just one? 

Thanks,
Karen

-- 
Message posted via AccessMonster.com
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-conversion/200802/1
date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:55:02 GMT   author:   kscheu via AccessMonster.com u7307@uwe

Re: How many user licenses required for SQL Server BE   
SQL is licensed on either a per server, per user, or per concurrent user 
basis - I don't know which.  If it is per user - you will need 50 licenses. 
If it is per concurrent user - you will need enough licenses to cover the 
maximum number of users logged in at one time.  This may be 50 or 1 
depending on how your application is used.  If the users use SQL server for 
other applications, they already have the license and will not need to 
acquire separate ones to run your access application.


"kscheu via AccessMonster.com" <u7307@uwe> wrote in message 
news:7f489ab94e23a@uwe...
>I have an Access front end application that links to Access Back end tables
> located on a server.  The Front End application is used by approx. 50 
> users,
> some internal and some thru Term Server.  I am planning to convert the
> Backend access database to SQL server, but I am confused as to the number 
> of
> user licenses I would need to purchase.  If I create pass through queries 
> and
> use one login id to SQL server for the Front end to use to access the SQL
> Server BE tables, will I need a user license for all 50 users or just one 
> for
> the FE application?
>
> What about if I link the BE SQL Server tables to the FE?   Will I need 50
> licenses or just one?
>
> Thanks,
> Karen
>
> -- 
> Message posted via AccessMonster.com
> http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-conversion/200802/1
>
date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:51:57 -0500   author:   Pat Hartman please no

06????   
"Pat Hartman" <please no email@aol.com> дÈëÓʼþ
news:eufQn2LbIHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> SQL is licensed on either a per server, per user, or per concurrent user
> basis - I don't know which.  If it is per user - you will need 50
licenses.
> If it is per concurrent user - you will need enough licenses to cover the
> maximum number of users logged in at one time.  This may be 50 or 1
> depending on how your application is used.  If the users use SQL server
for
> other applications, they already have the license and will not need to
> acquire separate ones to run your access application.
>
>
> "kscheu via AccessMonster.com" <u7307@uwe> wrote in message
> news:7f489ab94e23a@uwe...
> >I have an Access front end application that links to Access Back end
tables
> > located on a server.  The Front End application is used by approx. 50
> > users,
> > some internal and some thru Term Server.  I am planning to convert the
> > Backend access database to SQL server, but I am confused as to the
number
> > of
> > user licenses I would need to purchase.  If I create pass through
queries
> > and
> > use one login id to SQL server for the Front end to use to access the
SQL
> > Server BE tables, will I need a user license for all 50 users or just
one
> > for
> > the FE application?
> >
> > What about if I link the BE SQL Server tables to the FE?   Will I need
50
> > licenses or just one?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Karen
> >
> > -- 
> > Message posted via AccessMonster.com
> > http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-conversion/200802/1
> >
>
>
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 16:19:12 +0800   author:   ??????

06??????????   
"Pat Hartman" <please no email@aol.com> дÈëÓʼþ
news:eufQn2LbIHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> SQL is licensed on either a per server, per user, or per concurrent user
> basis - I don't know which.  If it is per user - you will need 50
licenses.
> If it is per concurrent user - you will need enough licenses to cover the
> maximum number of users logged in at one time.  This may be 50 or 1
> depending on how your application is used.  If the users use SQL server
for
> other applications, they already have the license and will not need to
> acquire separate ones to run your access application.
>
>
> "kscheu via AccessMonster.com" <u7307@uwe> wrote in message
> news:7f489ab94e23a@uwe...
> >I have an Access front end application that links to Access Back end
tables
> > located on a server.  The Front End application is used by approx. 50
> > users,
> > some internal and some thru Term Server.  I am planning to convert the
> > Backend access database to SQL server, but I am confused as to the
number
> > of
> > user licenses I would need to purchase.  If I create pass through
queries
> > and
> > use one login id to SQL server for the Front end to use to access the
SQL
> > Server BE tables, will I need a user license for all 50 users or just
one
> > for
> > the FE application?
> >
> > What about if I link the BE SQL Server tables to the FE?   Will I need
50
> > licenses or just one?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Karen
> >
> > -- 
> > Message posted via AccessMonster.com
> > http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-conversion/200802/1
> >
>
>
date: Wed, 7 May 2008 16:21:28 +0800   author:   lunwanting

Re: 06»á¼Æ   
drytfthgmgmvvgmjf u dr7i84g
"²Ì´ä÷"  wrote in message 
news:esQ6ksBsIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> "Pat Hartman" <please no email@aol.com> дÈëÓʼþ
> news:eufQn2LbIHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> SQL is licensed on either a per server, per user, or per concurrent user
>> basis - I don't know which.  If it is per user - you will need 50
> licenses.
>> If it is per concurrent user - you will need enough licenses to cover the
>> maximum number of users logged in at one time.  This may be 50 or 1
>> depending on how your application is used.  If the users use SQL server
> for
>> other applications, they already have the license and will not need to
>> acquire separate ones to run your access application.
>>
>>
>> "kscheu via AccessMonster.com" <u7307@uwe> wrote in message
>> news:7f489ab94e23a@uwe...
>> >I have an Access front end application that links to Access Back end
> tables
>> > located on a server.  The Front End application is used by approx. 50
>> > users,
>> > some internal and some thru Term Server.  I am planning to convert the
>> > Backend access database to SQL server, but I am confused as to the
> number
>> > of
>> > user licenses I would need to purchase.  If I create pass through
> queries
>> > and
>> > use one login id to SQL server for the Front end to use to access the
> SQL
>> > Server BE tables, will I need a user license for all 50 users or just
> one
>> > for
>> > the FE application?
>> >
>> > What about if I link the BE SQL Server tables to the FE?   Will I need
> 50
>> > licenses or just one?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Karen
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Message posted via AccessMonster.com
>> > http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-conversion/200802/1
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
date: Sat, 31 May 2008 12:31:07 +0100   author:   june1

Re: 06»á¼Æ   
yes ok
"²Ì´ä÷"  wrote in message 
news:esQ6ksBsIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> "Pat Hartman" <please no email@aol.com> дÈëÓʼþ
> news:eufQn2LbIHA.4180@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> SQL is licensed on either a per server, per user, or per concurrent user
>> basis - I don't know which.  If it is per user - you will need 50
> licenses.
>> If it is per concurrent user - you will need enough licenses to cover the
>> maximum number of users logged in at one time.  This may be 50 or 1
>> depending on how your application is used.  If the users use SQL server
> for
>> other applications, they already have the license and will not need to
>> acquire separate ones to run your access application.
>>
>>
>> "kscheu via AccessMonster.com" <u7307@uwe> wrote in message
>> news:7f489ab94e23a@uwe...
>> >I have an Access front end application that links to Access Back end
> tables
>> > located on a server.  The Front End application is used by approx. 50
>> > users,
>> > some internal and some thru Term Server.  I am planning to convert the
>> > Backend access database to SQL server, but I am confused as to the
> number
>> > of
>> > user licenses I would need to purchase.  If I create pass through
> queries
>> > and
>> > use one login id to SQL server for the Front end to use to access the
> SQL
>> > Server BE tables, will I need a user license for all 50 users or just
> one
>> > for
>> > the FE application?
>> >
>> > What about if I link the BE SQL Server tables to the FE?   Will I need
> 50
>> > licenses or just one?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Karen
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Message posted via AccessMonster.com
>> > http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/access-conversion/200802/1
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:00:05 +0100   author:   june1

Google
 
Web ureader.com


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us