|
|
|
date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:22:07 GMT,
group: microsoft.public.word.web.authoring
back
Re: Word HTML Tags
Hi Pop,
FWIW, limiting factors in
Word 97's HTML add-on is that, like Word97
it can't do nested tables or CSS, and is limited
to 16 colors for text.
It does have a couple of features no longer in
later versions though as well :)
=========
<<"PopS" wrote in message news:eyYVOxgiFHA.2444@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
If you have an old copy of Word97 around, it'll create
a lot cleaner HTML code; none of the bloat, etc.. xml
et al aren't really intended for writing web pages on
the internet; they're more for internal pages, I think.
HTH,
Pop >>
--
Let us know if this helped you,
Bob Buckland ?:-)
MS Office System Products MVP
*Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends*
For Everyday MS Office tips to "use right away" -
http://microsoft.com/events/series/administrativetipsandtricks.mspx
date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:00:35 -0700
author: Bob Buckland ?:-\) 75214.226(At Beautiful Downtown)compuserve.com
Re: Word HTML Tags
Yup, I agree Bob;
WD97's not the cutting edge, but it is pretty useful as
long as it's only one of your tools and you don't want
a complexity in your coding. It's simplicity in
itself, IMO. I should have mentioned pros/cons I
guess, amongst some other things, but I didn't consider
it relevant at the time for some reason. I only seem
to have two online modes: Write-a-book, and
Reader-Digest. Never do get the right combo!
I survived just fine with a combo of WRD97, Front
Page Express, IE and NoteTAB, up to about a year ago.
At the moment I'm on to NVU, an open source
wysiwyg/code editor that's at rev 1.0 after a long Beta
and still needs work, but ... it's the closest to a
turnkey I've found to date, not counting the
dreamweavers of the world, etc.. The only thing it
won't do is Frames, which is NBD to me 'cause CSS has
finally caught on. So, between NVU, IE and
Mozilla/Netscape, I'm feeling pretty good.
Cheers!
Pop
"Bob Buckland ?:-)" <75214.226(At Beautiful
Downtown)compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:O$mZqCkiFHA.1048@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi Pop,
>
> FWIW, limiting factors in
> Word 97's HTML add-on is that, like Word97
> it can't do nested tables or CSS, and is limited
> to 16 colors for text.
>
> It does have a couple of features no longer in
> later versions though as well :)
>
> =========
> <<"PopS" wrote in
> message news:eyYVOxgiFHA.2444@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> If you have an old copy of Word97 around, it'll
> create
> a lot cleaner HTML code; none of the bloat, etc..
> xml
> et al aren't really intended for writing web pages on
> the internet; they're more for internal pages, I
> think.
>
> HTH,
>
> Pop >>
>
>
> --
> Let us know if this helped you,
>
> Bob Buckland ?:-)
> MS Office System Products MVP
>
> *Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big
> dividends*
>
> For Everyday MS Office tips to "use right away" -
>
> http://microsoft.com/events/series/administrativetipsandtricks.mspx
>
>
>
date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:13:08 -0400
author: PopS
|
|
