|
|
|
date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:38:01 -0700,
group: microsoft.public.word.numbering
back
Re: Question on restaring paragraph numbering
Word expects no "gaps" when you apply outline numbering, that is, levels not
explicitly applied to text are assumed, meaning that numbering increments.
For example, the following happens if you apply numbered Heading 1--Heading
3 paragraphs in the "incorrect" order:
1 Heading 1
1.1.1 Heading 3
1.2 Heading 2 <-- A previous Heading 2 paragraph is assumed because this
paragraph follows Heading 3.
--
Stefan Blom
Microsoft Word MVP
"tcarp" wrote in message
news:05B1BC48-7E20-447B-9063-ECCDC94BA727@microsoft.com...
> I've been successfully using the technique for outline numbering but have
> run
> into a situation where the restart numbering isn't doing what I want.
>
> In this sequence things work fine:
>
> Index 1 (I)
> Index 2 (A)
> Index 3 (1)
>
> In this sequence things aren't so good:
>
> Index 1 (I)
> Index 6 (a) <---
> Index 2 (B) <--- should be A
> Index 3 (1)
>
> The document I'm working with does not always go down the index chain
> sequentially (e.g. index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.). I know that sounds really
> screwy; it's just I'm stretching outline numbering a little.
>
> My basic question is:
>
> If all the levels are set to restart numbering on the previous level AND
> in
> the document there is an intervening lower level in the flow, does it
> screw
> up the restart?
>
> In the tests I've run it doesn't matter how many of the lower level
> entries
> occur, the restart is off by 1. For example, these two sequences:
>
> Index 1 (I)
> Index 6 (a) <---
> Index 2 (B) <--- should be A
> Index 3 (1)
>
> Index 1 (I)
> Index 6 (a) <---
> Index 6 (b) <---
> Index 2 (B) <--- should be A
> Index 3 (1)
>
> Both have index 2 off by 1 on the restart.
>
> What I suspect someone will tell me is that outline numbering goes a bit
> whaco when it doesn't see a nice descending level sequence in the
> document.
>
> Tom
date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:56:02 +0200
author: Stefan Blom
|
|